2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in the saliva of young healthy subjects before and after citric acid stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This would at least highlight the potential for pepsin to be present in the oral cavity after a reflux event but may not be detectable in saliva as it is still bound to the oral mucosa. Recent studies in healthy individuals have suggested unstimulated saliva production rates of approximately 700-800 µL/min which may increase by 2-3-fold during stimulation [34][35][36]. Similarly, previous estimates of swallowing frequency vary dramatically, with average numbers of swallows equating to 600 over a 24-h period [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would at least highlight the potential for pepsin to be present in the oral cavity after a reflux event but may not be detectable in saliva as it is still bound to the oral mucosa. Recent studies in healthy individuals have suggested unstimulated saliva production rates of approximately 700-800 µL/min which may increase by 2-3-fold during stimulation [34][35][36]. Similarly, previous estimates of swallowing frequency vary dramatically, with average numbers of swallows equating to 600 over a 24-h period [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we designed our technique to prevent this intervention. Our laboratory has successfully applied citric acid to stimulate sAA for more than 30 years by using the standardized method described in the section . As a quality control, we detected pH value of saliva samples, and the sample would be discarded if its pH value was less than 6.4, which was considered to be the lower limit of saliva pH value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our laboratory has successfully applied citric acid to stimulate sAA for more than 30 years by using the standardized method described in the section. 19,30 As a quality control, we detected pH value of saliva samples, and the sample would be discarded if its pH value was less than 6.4, which was considered to be the lower limit of saliva pH value. In the present study, no saliva sample was less than 6.4, and pH value increased significantly in both CNAG and healthy groups after acid stimulation, which suggest that citric acid did not alter salivary pH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a longitudinal study of children, followed from ages 7 to 12 years, at age 12 years, the average stimulated salivary flow rate was 1.8 ml/minute ± 0.6 and there was no significant difference between males and females ( = 0.7697) [18]. In a study of 55 participants, aged 20-40 years, in which saliva was stimulated with citric acid, there was a significant difference in male and female stimulated salivary rates [27].…”
Section: Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%