2016
DOI: 10.1080/23335432.2016.1191372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in trunk acceleration and related posture during shuttle run cutting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involved the simultaneous collection of the subject’s vertical ground reaction force and accelerometer data. Indeed, the frequent requirement to perform unexpected or anticipated cutting maneuver (CM) while running or engaging in outdoor activities poses a significant risk of injury ( Nagano et al, 2016 ). Previous studies have confirmed that there is a greater risk during 90° CM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involved the simultaneous collection of the subject’s vertical ground reaction force and accelerometer data. Indeed, the frequent requirement to perform unexpected or anticipated cutting maneuver (CM) while running or engaging in outdoor activities poses a significant risk of injury ( Nagano et al, 2016 ). Previous studies have confirmed that there is a greater risk during 90° CM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accelerometer was secured to the upper back of the participant using an exclusive vest with compressive inner wear that did not prevent their upper or lower limb movements [15]. We selected trunk acceleration as a variable indicating musculoskeletal load because it more reliably assesses GRF than knee acceleration does [11], and it does not prevent the upper and lower limb movements of athletes during measurement. The three axes of the accelerometer were aligned close to the anatomical axes i.e.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simons and Bradshaw reported that the impact load during jumping and landing tasks and GRF could be reliably assessed using accelerometry [9,10]. Moreover, vertical acceleration during change of direction can potentially reflect gender differences and stiff cutting movement [11]. Inertia sensors demonstrating excellent accuracy counting volleyball-specific jumps is an example of its application during sports activity [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No unified view has been obtained on an index of acceleration. Peak resultant acceleration (PRA) is an index measure reflecting high-impact movements, gender differences, and stiff cutting movements [15]; it is also correlated with ground reaction force [11]. In volleyball, PRA also reflects individual differences in jumping and non-jumping movements [10]; whereas in badminton, the frequency and details of high-impact movements were estimated using PRA [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%