Gender Disparity in Leadership Positions of General Surgical Societies in North America, Europe, and Oceania

Abstract

Background Despite the number of female medical-school applicants reaching an all-time high and the increasing number of females in surgical training, males retain an overwhelming majority in senior surgical academic positions and formal leadership positions. This study aims to better understand the extent of and influences for gender disparity in general surgical societies throughout North America, Europe, and Oceania. Methods Data collection for this retrospective cross-sectional study took place between June and December 2017. Committee and subcommittee members from the eight selected general surgical societies that met the inclusion criteria (n = 311) were compiled into an Excel spreadsheet in which the data was recorded. Analyzed metrics included university academic ranking, surgical society leadership position, h-index, number of citations, and total publications. SCOPUS database (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) was used to generate author metrics, and STATA version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for statistical analysis. Results Overall, 83.28% of members of the entities we studied were male and 16.72% were females. Males had significantly higher representation than females in all societies (Pearson chi 2 = 29.081; p-value = 0.010). Females were underrepresented in all society leadership positions and university academic rankings. Male members had a higher median h-index, more number of citations, and more total publications. Conclusions The composition of the general surgical societies included in this study demonstrated significant gender disparity. Female inclusivity initiatives and policies must be initiated to promote greater research productivity and early career opportunities for female surgeons in the specialty of general surgery.

Race, ethnicity, and gender in academic obstetrics and gynecology: 12-year trends

“…11 However, despite such increases in female representation, women continue to be paid less, promoted more slowly, and underrepresented in senior academic ranks and leadership positions. 11e13 Similar gender disparity has previously been documented in academic disciplines, 14 professional societies, 15 and editorial boards of medical journals. 16 In contrast, there is a paucity of research on the state of racial disparity in academic OBGYN.…”

The experiences of female surgeons around the world: a scoping review

“…[ 106 ] High income United States Cross-sectional analysis n = 841 (80/761) 10% Not reported 2019 Gender Disparity in Leadership Positions of General Surgical Societies in North America, Europe, and Oceania. [ 20 ] High income United States Australia New Zealand (Europe) Δ Retrospective cross-sectional analysis Not reported 2019 Practice patterns and work environments that influence gender inequality among academic surgeons. [ 107 ] High income United States Retrospective cross-sectional analysis n = 51 (10/41) 20% No funding 2019 Female Neurosurgeons in Europe-On a Prevailing Glass Ceiling.…”

“… * Six studies examined additional countries but did not analyze the differences between country populations [ 15 – 20 ] † For the purposes of this review, Hong Kong (SAR, China) was treated as an entity distinct from China as the experiences of female surgeons between Hong Kong (SAR, China) and mainland China likely differ …”

“…* Six studies examined additional countries but did not analyze the differences between country populations [ 15 – 20 ]…”

Influences for Gender Disparity in Academic Family Medicine in North American Medical Schools

“…Under-representation of women in faculty composition and leadership roles is described as gender disparity [5]. This disparity has been documented in medical and surgical specialties, editorial boards, professional societies, and authorships [6][7][8][9][10]. It contributes to the current lack of advancement, career satisfaction, and professional confidence in women in academic medicine [11].…”