Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa

Abstract

This study builds upon the literature documenting gender disparities in science by investigating research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in three countries. This analysis departs from both the general comparison of researchers across organizational settings and academic appointments on one hand, and the definition of “elite” by the research outcome variables on the other, which are common in previous studies. Instead, this paper’s approach considers the stratification of scientific careers by carefully constructing matched samples of men and women holding research chairs in Canada, the United States and South Africa, along with a control group of departmental peers. The analysis is based on a unique, hand-curated dataset including 943 researchers, which allows for a systematic comparison of successful scientists vetted through similar selection mechanisms. Our results show that even among elite scientists a pattern of stratified productivity and recognition by gender remains, with more prominent gaps in recognition. Our results point to the need for gender equity initiatives in science policy to critically examine assessment criteria and evaluation mechanisms to emphasize multiple expressions of research excellence.

Open Access Publishing Probabilities Based on Gender and Authorship Structures in Vietnam

“…Gender inequality still exists in the modern system of scientific publishing [1][2][3][4][5]. In terms of citation and authorship position, gender differences favoring men can be found in many disciplinaries such as political science [6], economics and management [7,8], neurology [9], and critical care research [10].…”

Factors that Influence the Individual Research Output of University Professors: The Case of Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia

“…Sá et al (2020) studied productivity among elite scientists and found that men outperform women in the number of publications, and receive substantially more citations. Several studies aim to explain the lower intellectual production of women throughout their careers caused by differences in family responsibilities, different patterns of time use, unequal resource allocation, different patterns in academic collaboration, and gender bias in peer-review (Sá et al, 2020). However, some studies contradict these results since they found that gender has no significant effect on research productivity indicators and women have production rates similar to their male peers (Khalil & Khalil, 2019).…”

A study to investigate the impact of social research toward research productivity

“…A similar study by Koseoglu, King, and Rahimi (2019) reported significant gender diversity of research productivity in the USA, the UK, Canada and France. Recently, Sá, Cowley, Martinez, Kachynska, and Sabzalieva (2020) reported gender diversity in research productivity in the USA, Canada, and South Africa. The authors found that men published 16% more papers than women and were cited 68% more frequently than women.…”