Gender Identity Predicts Autobiographical Memory Phenomenology

Abstract

Gender differences emerge regularly in autobiographical memory research. We suggest that gender differences in phenomenological self-report measures of autobiographical memory are rooted in gender identity rather than categorical gender. Reminiscing about the past is perceived as a female-typical activity, and therefore, gender-typical individuals will conform to these stereotypes. In this study, 196 participants, age 18-40, each rated the phenomenology of four event memories. Ratings of feminine gender identity, also completed by participants, consistently correlated with MEQ scores, indicating that greater endorsement of feminine gender norms predicted higher memory quality and valence. Masculine gender identity also correlated with MEQ scores, but these correlations were less consistent. Findings suggest that a focus on gender identity can both explain the source of some gender differences in autobiographical memory and potentially explain some inconsistencies in the current literature.

Autobiographical memory in transsexual individuals who have undergone genderaffirming surgery: Vivid, self-focused, but not so happy childhood memories

“…Although there are no studies devoted to the autobiographical memory of transsexual individuals, it seems quite evident that congruency of the self to a gender stereotype, not gender itself, predicts those autobiographical memory characteristics that are in line with common beliefs about gender differences in memory (Grysman & Fivush, 2016). The authors indicated that the higher participants scored on the femininity scale, the more vivid, emotional, and easily shared with others their memories were, according to self-reports.…”

What Are Our Personal Memories for? Effects of Gender and Country in Perceived Functions of Everyday Memories in Danish and Spanish College Students

“…With regard to the characteristics of the sample, we assume that the limited amount of gender difference can be attributed to it, and especially, the age of the participants and their high level of education. In this vein, Grysman, Fivush, and Merrill (Grysman & Fivush, 2016; Grysman, Merrill, & Fivush, 2016) have argued that rather than categorical gender, it is gender identity, to what extent do people (and, especially, women) identify with stereotypical gender norms, that predicts both the content and the phenomenological characteristics. This is in our view a very promising avenue for future research that may help us understand the complex relation between gender and AM.…”

Medicine Bag: An Autoethnographic Account of Learning to Use Memory and Indigeneity as Resources in College Advising

“…Memories from a female narrative that are autobiographical in nature versus those by males have been examined in research to uncover gender differences. It appears that gender identity plays a larger part in recall than gender itself when studying these autobiographical narratives (Grysman & Fivush, 2016). More often researchers look at stereotypical gender identity as a means of comparison for predicted memory.…”

“…I reject being the voice in a category or a representative sample. Memories serve as reliable markers for a sense of self throughout our lifetimes (Grysman & Fivush, 2016).…”

“…Supporting academic success in a helping profession should be open to the use of memories as a tool for advisors. Just as memories give us a reminder of who we are throughout our life's journey (Grysman & Fivush, 2016), this sense and hold related to being can be relayed to students.…”