2021
DOI: 10.1177/1368430220984248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender inequalities during COVID-19

Abstract: The onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic put a halt to progress toward gender equality and, instead, exacerbated existing gender inequalities across domains—from gendered divisions of labour to economic stability. In this paper we document some of the most glaring gender inequalities that have arisen in the COVID-19 pandemic and discuss how social psychological theories and research—including work on gender stereotypes and roles, responses to threat, precarious masculinity, perceptions of risk, and backlash—c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
112
1
13

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
112
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The vulnerability narrative is also concordant with negative age stereotypes of incompetence, which underpin age discrimination in the workplace, in health and social care, and in the provision of goods and services (Levy et al, 2020;Swift et al, 2017). Age stereotypes can also inform the ways we interact with older people, such as using overly patronizing gestures or tones (Chasteen et al, 2020; see also Fisher & Ryan, 2021, for a discussion of gender stereotypes during . This is costly not only to individuals' health and well-being (Jackson et al, 2019), but also to the economy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The vulnerability narrative is also concordant with negative age stereotypes of incompetence, which underpin age discrimination in the workplace, in health and social care, and in the provision of goods and services (Levy et al, 2020;Swift et al, 2017). Age stereotypes can also inform the ways we interact with older people, such as using overly patronizing gestures or tones (Chasteen et al, 2020; see also Fisher & Ryan, 2021, for a discussion of gender stereotypes during . This is costly not only to individuals' health and well-being (Jackson et al, 2019), but also to the economy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These papers make important contributions to the many inequalities exposed during the pandemic. We are aware that further research is underway specifically addressing other types of inequalities including gender equalityexamining issues such as gendered divisions of labour, gender stereotypes and roles, responses to threat, systemic inequalities in the wake of COVID-19 (Fisher and Ryan, 2021). More generally, this research highlights both the need for and the potential impacts of accounting and accountability research concerned with inequalities.…”
Section: Accounting and Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The perspectives presented here illustrate the contribution of social psychology in understanding why COVID-19 has had such an impact on intergroup inequality. They also highlight paths for future research, including research that challenges binary notions of gender (Fisher & Ryan, 2021) and homogenous representations of older people (Swift & Chasteen, 2021), that tests messaging emphasizing the contribution of immigrants during the pandemic (Esses & Hamilton, 2021), and which positions the experiences of blacks and people of color as central in exploring anti-racism (Marshburn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Intergroup Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we focus on intergroup inequality -how the pandemic has exacerbated gender inequality (Fisher & Ryan, 2021) and ageism (Swift & Chasteen, 2021), influenced xenophobia and attitudes toward immigration (Esses & Hamilton, 2021), and encouraged greater awareness of racial inequality (Marshburn et al, 2021). Third, we turn to worldviews during COVID-19, examining the flourishing of conspiracy theories (Douglas, 2021) and science skepticism (Rutjens et al, 2021), and threats to the self, presented by the pandemic (Kruglanski et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%