Gender influence on work satisfaction and leadership for medical oncologists: a survey of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

Abstract

Background Women represent an increasing proportion of the oncology workforce; however, globally this does not translate into leadership roles, reflecting disparities in career opportunities between men and women. The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) undertook a survey to investigate gender disparity in the Spanish oncology context. Design An online survey was made available to SEOM medical oncologists between February and May 2019. It included demographics, professional context and achievements, parenthood and family conciliation issues, workplace gender bias, and approaches to address disparities. Results Of the 316 eligible respondents, 71.5% were women, 59.5% were aged 45 or younger, and 66.1% had children. Among women, 12.4% were division or unit heads, compared with 45.5% of men, with most women (74.3%) being attending medical oncologists, compared with 45.5% of men. More males were professors (34.4% versus 14.2% of females), had a PhD (46.7% versus 28.8%), and/or had led clinical research groups (41.1% versus 9.7%). Spending time overseas after completing a residency was also more common for men than women (34.4% versus 20.4%). Professional satisfaction was similar between genders, driven primarily by patient care and intellectual stimulation. More women (40.7%) considered parenthood to have a strong negative impact on their career, compared with men (9.0%). Main perceived barriers to gender equality included a lack of work–life balance (72.6% women, 44.4% men), bias of peers and superiors (50.0% women, 18.9% men), and different career goals (41.2% women, 24.4% men). Preferred solutions included educational programs and scholarships (52.9%), communication and leadership training (35.8%), childcare at conferences (33.2%), and postmaternity return-to-work incentives (32.0%). Conclusion There is a clear paucity of equal opportunities for female oncologists in Spain. This can be addressed by encouraging professional development and merit recognition particularly for younger female oncologists, and empowering women to be involved in management and leadership of institutions and professional societies.

Gender-related differences in career development among gynecologic oncology surgeons in Europe. European Network of Young Gynecologic Oncologists’ Survey based data

“…With respect to PhD degrees and professorship positions, our finding in gynecologic oncology surgery are in contradiction to data reported in medical oncology by Elez et al. ( 24 ), who did report on a gender gap, while we did not reveal a gender disparity in our survey. However, our analysis showed that male published more than female.…”

Perception and Improvisation of Gender Climate in Oncology and Role of International and National Societies

“…More women (41 vs. 9%) felt that parenthood affected their careers adversely than men. 9 A smaller survey from the Middle East and North Africa exploring gender equality in the workplace had 64% of women reporting that their gender had a moderate to significant impact on their careers. However, 54% of women were in managerial positions.…”

“…In addition to mentorship sessions and a specific W4O fora at ESMO congresses, there are ongoing and completed studies to measure and monitor the gender disparity in the oncology world. 1,[5][6][7]9 Collaborative work with the national women oncology networks helps bridge the gap between women and men. Tackling gender inequality further, W4O addresses the women issues from the grassroot level by mentorship and roundtable social media discussions that will bring to light the gender gaps at all career levels.…”

Activities Performed by ASCO-Sponsored Oncology Student Interest Groups in Latin America: Assessing Members' Preferences and Leaders' Challenges

“…However, other studies have shown that just a minority of female oncologists have leadership roles, even when they represent the majority of clinical teams' workforce. 9,10 Although most medical students stated that their school offered activities and courses focused on oncology as part of their curricula, only an alarming minority (35%) considered them good or excellent. Of note, these results could not adequately reflect the perception of most medical students regarding oncology training as most universities in Latin America give oncology courses in the latest years of the medical career, and the majority of OSIGs members were coursing the first years of medical school.…”

“…However, other studies have shown that just a minority of female oncologists have leadership roles, even when they represent the majority of clinical teams' workforce. 9 , 10 …”