2019
DOI: 10.3368/jhr.56.3.0918-9736r2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Peer Effects on Students’ Academic and Noncognitive Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
52
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A third approach is to control for pre-assignment characteristics that reveal systematic assignment in the preferred specification, thus relying on mean independence of treatment conditional on these characteristics (e.g. Lavy and Schlosser, 2011; Gong, Lu and Song, 2019). This approach is not costly in terms of power and does not require intimate knowledge of the institutional background, yet it assumes (often implicitly) that controlling for characteristics related to systematic assignment fully accounts for related unobserved characteristics that also determine assignment.…”
Section: Testing For Random Assignment Of Peer Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third approach is to control for pre-assignment characteristics that reveal systematic assignment in the preferred specification, thus relying on mean independence of treatment conditional on these characteristics (e.g. Lavy and Schlosser, 2011; Gong, Lu and Song, 2019). This approach is not costly in terms of power and does not require intimate knowledge of the institutional background, yet it assumes (often implicitly) that controlling for characteristics related to systematic assignment fully accounts for related unobserved characteristics that also determine assignment.…”
Section: Testing For Random Assignment Of Peer Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, we cover the vast majority of achievement peer effect mechanisms-hypothesized or tested-in this vast literature (see Table 1). Most previous studies test only a few potential mechanisms for academic peer effects but never more than three or four at a time, and never in a formal mediation analysis (though two other studies, Gong, Lu and Song (2019) and Zölitz and Feld (Forth. ), use mediation analyses to investigate mechanisms behind the effect of classroom peer gender).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar violations to national mandates are common in similar settings (e.g. Gong et al, 2019;Eble and Hu, 2019). We develop a data-driven procedure to remove schools likely to be defying the mandate of random assignment from our estimation sample and show that data in this trimmed sample is strongly consistent with random assignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A third approach is to control for pre-assignment characteristics that reveal systematic assignment in the preferred specification, thus relying on mean independence of treatment conditional on these characteristics (e.g. Lavy and Schlosser, 2011;Gong et al, 2019). This approach is not costly in terms of power and does not require intimate knowledge of the institutional background, yet it assumes (often implicitly) that controlling for characteristics related to systematic assignment fully accounts for related unobserved characteristics that also determine assignment.…”
Section: Testing For Random Assignment Of Peer Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation