2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender representation cues labels of hard and soft sciences

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In many academic or technological fields, typically competitive activities or areas—such as scientific publications or software development—are more valued than those focused on sharing and cooperation, like community building, teaching, or mentoring. The latter activities are equally, if not more, relevant and challenging, and are usually performed by women, racialized people, people with disabilities, and other minoritized groups [ 22 – 24 ]. When planning the program for the conference, consider giving visibility to the whole range of activities and practitioners that contribute to the field by proposing new thematic sessions, broadening the scope of talks, keynotes, and tutorials.…”
Section: Rule 4: Consciously Counteract Bias In the Conference Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many academic or technological fields, typically competitive activities or areas—such as scientific publications or software development—are more valued than those focused on sharing and cooperation, like community building, teaching, or mentoring. The latter activities are equally, if not more, relevant and challenging, and are usually performed by women, racialized people, people with disabilities, and other minoritized groups [ 22 – 24 ]. When planning the program for the conference, consider giving visibility to the whole range of activities and practitioners that contribute to the field by proposing new thematic sessions, broadening the scope of talks, keynotes, and tutorials.…”
Section: Rule 4: Consciously Counteract Bias In the Conference Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While greater participation is vital, access is only part of the problem. Gender stereotypes about women’s STEM competencies create persistent challenges for those women who “make it” in STEM fields, including the devaluation of their work (Light et al, 2022). Indeed, researchers have found that a lack of STEM skills was the lowest‐ranked barrier by women in renewable energy industries for women’s engagement in green jobs (International Renewable Energy Agency [IRENA], 2019).…”
Section: Skills For Green Jobsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El test de Finkbeiner es una manera de reconocer preguntas estereotipadas en este tipo de piezas periodísticas; para que no pase el test el artículo tiene que decir: el hecho de que el sujeto sea una mujer; cuál es el trabajo de su marido; cómo se las arregla para cuidar a sus hijas e hijos; cómo maternaliza a sus subordinades; cómo le sorprendió la competitividad en su campo; cómo es un modelo a seguir para otras mujeres; cómo es la "primera mujer en ..." Vamos a detenernos a analizar la violencia simbólica de estas aseveraciones. El hecho de que el sujeto sea una mujer: Se nos pide de alguna forma seguir siendo una anomalía, ya que los campos con demasiadas mujeres se ven como blandos y no tan elitistas (Light, 2022). El trabajo de su marido:…”
Section: ¿Qué Es Un Físico? ¿Qué Es Una Física?unclassified