This article examines the growth and scope of corporate benefits packages and their usefulness to the average worker. A sample of benefits packages from Fortune 500 corporations was assessed, and results revealed that both the documents'readability and comprehensibility levels far exceed that of the average worker. The study builds on the recent and growing scholarly focus on "mass" business communications and proposes a number of promising avenues for future research.hile business communication traditionally focused on the composiWtion of personally transmitted messages (e.g., letters, speeches), recent years have witnessed increasing attention to various forms of &dquo;mass&dquo; business communication. Employee publications, annual reports, and benefits packages have attracted business communication scholars. For example, Clampitt, Crevcoure, and Hartel (1986) explored the nature and impact of employee publications within complex organizations.The extent, coverage, costs, and benefits of written corporate communication policy were analyzed by Gilsdorf (1987); and Kuiper (1988) assessed the gender representation in corporate annual reports vis-a-vis corporate climate. The effectiveness of contemporary corporate annual report prose communication was studied by Courtis (1987) who found his sample of 65 Canadian annual reports to be beyond the fluent comprehension ease of 92 percent of the adult population and 56 percent of the investor population. Building on this recent and growing scholarly focus on mass business communication, the researchers chose to analyze a sample of benefit packages from Fortune 500 corporations.The 1980s witnessed marked changes in the American business environment, changes that have brought employee benefit packages to the forefront of corporate personnel policies. Economically, the combined factors of long, steady, and sustained economic growth; low inflation; low interest rates; a high level of employment; increasing productivity; and plentiful (and easily accessible) credit have alleviated pressures on wages and salaries, inducing workers to focus instead on nonsalary benefits. Sociologically, the workforce itself has been changing. The post-war baby boom cohort is aging; two-wage-earner households and single parent working heads of households are increasing -as are nontraditional (e.g., recent immigrants) and less skilled workers. Perhaps most dramatic of all, workers are changing employers more fre-