“…Most Asian research on adult-focused television advertising supports H2 (mode of presentation), H3 (credibility basis) and H4 (role), which propose that male characters often perform voice-overs and are portrayed as product authorities and in autonomous roles, while females are often presented in a visual context and are portrayed as product users and in dependent roles (For H2: Malaysia, Taiwan, and Japan; Bresnahan et al, 2001;India;Das, 2011;Japan;Furnham and Imadzu, 2002;Korea;Kim and Lowry, 2005; the Philippines; Prieler and Centeno, 2013;Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea;Prieler et al, 2015;For H3: Furnham and Mak, 1999;Furnham and Imadzu, 2002;Furnham and Paltzer, 2010;Malaysia;Lim and Furnham, 2016;Turkey;Uray and Burnaz, 2003;For H4: Japan;Arima, 2003;Lim and Furnham, 2016;Saudi Arabia;Uray and Burnaz, 2003;Nassif and Gunter, 2008). Similarly, it is expected that women, compared with men, are portrayed in domestic settings (H6) and are more closely associated with domestic products (H8); several Asian studies have found this to be true in adult-focused television advertising (Bresnahan et al, 2001;Furnham and Imadzu, 2002;Uray and Burnaz, 2003;Kim and Lowry, 2005;Das, 2011;Prieler et al, 2015). H1 (sex), H7 (product argument), H9 (reward type), and H10 (end comment), have been tested in several Asian countries in the context of adult-focused television advertising (Furnham and Mak, 1999;Furnham and Paltzer, 2010); however, the four hypotheses based on the McArthur and Resko coding method (H5: narrator role, H7: product argument, H9: reward type, and H10: end comments) have not been evaluated for gender representation in Indian television advertising for either adult-focused or children's channels.…”