Gender Segregation and the European Employment Strategy: Levels and Divisions

Abstract

▪ Equal opportunities has constituted one of the four pillars of the European Employment Strategy (EES) as approved at the Luxembourg summit in 1997. However, there are tensions between the EES and the imperatives of budgetary restraint (which have caused job losses in public services, where women are disproportionately employed) and between quantitative targets of increasing women's labour-force participation and qualitative targets of overcoming gender segregation. This article explores these tensions, drawing evidence from comparative European research and the particular experience of Sweden.

The implementation of equality legislation: the case of disabled graduates and reasonable adjustments

“…Turning to mediation; there is evidence that line managers and HR specialists do mediate legislation and policy, which is consistent with previous research (e.g., Colling and Dickens ; Cunningham and Hyman ; Gilbert et al . ; Gonas ; Purcell ). The study expanded this work by focusing on the constraining and enabling contexts that influence HR and line managers.…”

Achieving Flexibility through Insecurity: A Comparison of Work Environments in Fixed-term and Permanent Jobs in Finland and Canada

“…While there seem to be good intentions in promoting fixed-term jobs for those who have difficulty entering the labour market, concerns are raised about the quality of these jobs (Gonäs, 2003;ILO, 2003;Maxwell and Saunders, 2003). There is accumulated literature showing that those in fixed-term jobs in Canada and in other Anglo-Saxon countries experience poor working conditions compared to those in permanent jobs.…”

The European Construction Social Partners: Gender Equality in Theory and Practice

“…Key objectives are to reduce both the gender pay gap and sectoral as well as occupational gender segregation, which are seen as creating 'rigidity in the labour market, reducing the market's ability to respond to change' (EC, 2001). However research shows that the impact of this agenda in national member states remains uneven, and that there is a tension between the targets of increasing participation and reducing segregation (Gonäs, 2004;Rubery et al, 2003).…”