2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1555-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Transience, Network Partnerships and Risky Sexual Practices Among Young Persons who Inject Drugs

Abstract: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) may be at risk of acquiring HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) from risky sexual practices and elevated disease prevalence within their drug injection and sexual networks. We conducted a personal (egocentric) network study of young PWID (aged 18-30) from the Chicago metropolitan area. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations evaluated associations between individual and network factors and sexual behaviors. Of 162 participants, 116 (71.6%) were non-H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not find a statistically significant association between the level of risk of contracting DRID and gender (each included DRID together). This data is in contrast to the research of Hill et al (12) and Hotton and Boodram (13), who describe a higher level of risk of getting DRID due to a higher number of sexual partners and the frequency of having sex. Another study placed women at a higher risk than men for contracting DRID (14).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We did not find a statistically significant association between the level of risk of contracting DRID and gender (each included DRID together). This data is in contrast to the research of Hill et al (12) and Hotton and Boodram (13), who describe a higher level of risk of getting DRID due to a higher number of sexual partners and the frequency of having sex. Another study placed women at a higher risk than men for contracting DRID (14).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a cross-sectional personal (egocentric) network study of 164 young PWID and their injection, social support, and sexual networks. Detailed descriptions of sample recruitment, study design, and data collection methods are previously described [29,30].…”
Section: Subjects and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models commonly used to explain individual variation in risky behavior have included factors such as knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral skills as predictors (Bandura, 1994;Fishbein & Middlestadt, 1989;Fisher, Fisher, & Harman, 2003). Environmental and contextual factors are also important (Boodram, Golub, & Ouellet, 2010;Boodram, Hotton, Shekhtman, Gutfraind, & Dahari, 2018;Boodram, Mackesy-Amiti, & Latkin, 2015;German, Davey, & Latkin, 2007;Hotton & Boodram, 2017;Roy et al, 2011), especially in relation to planning public health responses, including harm reduction, increased testing, linkage to care, and availability of curative direct-acting antiviral (DAA) HCV therapy (Boodram et al, 2020;National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2016;Platt et al, 2018). The role of affect and emotion regulation in determining injection risk behavior, on the other hand, has received little attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%