1996
DOI: 10.2307/2547635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Values, and Intentions to Move in Rural Thailand

Abstract: "This article explores gender differences in the intentions to move among a sample of young adults in rural northeastern Thailand. Based on the value-expectancy framework of migration decisionmaking, an explanatory model is tested which includes migration-related value measures along with individual, household and community-level determinants of both intentions to move and change in intentions to move. Multinomial logistic regression results based on data from the 1992 Thailand National Migration Survey provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our main specification considers the revealed migration preference for a specific destination country . This may be a strong assumption (De Jong, 2000, De Jong et al, 1996 which is relaxed when we analyze the overall migration potential (rather than bilateral) by aggregating all potential migrants in a country of origin. Allowing for heterogeneity in preferences across individuals, but assuming that all individuals (i) value income from higher wages and higher probability of employment, and (ii) incur higher costs when moving farther and to more different countries, implies that -after controlling for country of origin characteristics -the share of people who would potentially migrate from  to  among all individuals,    , depends positively on the returns and negatively on the costs of migrating from  to  (see Borjas, 1987;or Grogger and Hanson, 2011 for a similar framework).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main specification considers the revealed migration preference for a specific destination country . This may be a strong assumption (De Jong, 2000, De Jong et al, 1996 which is relaxed when we analyze the overall migration potential (rather than bilateral) by aggregating all potential migrants in a country of origin. Allowing for heterogeneity in preferences across individuals, but assuming that all individuals (i) value income from higher wages and higher probability of employment, and (ii) incur higher costs when moving farther and to more different countries, implies that -after controlling for country of origin characteristics -the share of people who would potentially migrate from  to  among all individuals,    , depends positively on the returns and negatively on the costs of migrating from  to  (see Borjas, 1987;or Grogger and Hanson, 2011 for a similar framework).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These women were not moving to urban areas for marriage. Theirs were economically motivated moves, primarily to help support their family of origin's household economy (De Jong, Richter, et al 1996).…”
Section: Thailand: Gender Migration and Distinctions Across Migrant mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, patterns of marriage and settlement adjudicate against strong household ties with sons and tend towards strong ties with daughters, especially in Northeastern Thailand (Blanc-Szanton 1990;De Jong, Richter, et al 1996;Yoddumnern-Attig 1992). Thai households are matrilocal.…”
Section: Thailand: Gender Migration and Distinctions Across Migrant mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the studies do not explore network effects, as we understand them, where a migrant's remittance behavior may depend on that behavior's prevalence in her social group. This gap is all the more surprising given the plethora of empirical work in the larger migration literature, which establishes how individuals' migration behavior depends on that behavior in their families or communities (Curran et al 2005;Davis, Stecklov and Winters 2002;De Jong, Richter and Isarabhakdi 1996;Garip 2008;Massey and García-España 1987;Winters, Janvry and Sadoulet 2001). Prior migrants in the family or community, the argument goes, provide resources or normative pressures that increase individuals' likelihood of migration.…”
Section: A Network Explanation For Remittance Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%