2018
DOI: 10.1111/1759-3441.12224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Wage and Productivity Gaps in the Manufacturing Industry. The Case of Ghana

Abstract: The paper uses a panel of Ghanaian manufacturing data to examine the existence or nonexistence of labour market gender discrimination by comparing gender wage and productivity gaps for the period 1992–2003. In addition, the study investigates factors that affect the share of female employment. Results suggest that gender wage and productivity gaps exist in the manufacturing sector of Ghana. We also find no evidence of within‐firm gender wage discrimination, suggesting that the gender wage gap can be attributed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SMEs that are into manufacturing are in sectors ranging from food processing, textiles, and garments, wood products and furniture, metal products and machinery to detergents (Abegaz & Nene, 2018).…”
Section: Ghanaian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SMEs that are into manufacturing are in sectors ranging from food processing, textiles, and garments, wood products and furniture, metal products and machinery to detergents (Abegaz & Nene, 2018).…”
Section: Ghanaian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on wage inequalities in Ghana have focused on understanding the effects of trade openness and skilled-bias technological change on wages (Görg et al 2001), the gender-wage gap in the manufacturing sector (Abegaz and Nene 2018), and on examining genderwage gaps using different selection models -correcting for double selection bias (Boahen and Opoku 2021). However, only one study has investigated the private-public wage gap in Ghana using the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method (Younger and Osei-Assibey 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%