2008
DOI: 10.1108/01437720810904185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender wage gap and the glass ceiling effect: a firm‐level investigation

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to assess the relevance of the glass ceiling effect, according to which the gender log wage gap accelerates in the upper tail of the wage distribution, at the firm level. Design/methodology/approach -The empirical analysis is based on a sample of 4,654 employees, working in a French private company from the Defence and Aerospace sector. Quantile wage regressions were used to study whether a glass ceiling effect exits at the firm level. The difference between the male and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other construction related metaphors allow us to complete an organizational structure. "Glass floor" is a term used to describe a phenomenon that can occur at the lowest levels of organizations where staff are likely to have low educational qualifications and little likelihood of promotion (Barnet-Verzat and Wolff, 2008). Barnet-Verzat and Wolff report that gender inequality at this level can be more severe than at the top levels of organizations where glass ceilings exist.…”
Section: A Maze Of Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other construction related metaphors allow us to complete an organizational structure. "Glass floor" is a term used to describe a phenomenon that can occur at the lowest levels of organizations where staff are likely to have low educational qualifications and little likelihood of promotion (Barnet-Verzat and Wolff, 2008). Barnet-Verzat and Wolff report that gender inequality at this level can be more severe than at the top levels of organizations where glass ceilings exist.…”
Section: A Maze Of Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As different jobs of women and men might already reflect discrimination, the total GWG might be underestimated if the estimates control for jobs (e.g. Barnet‐Verzat and Wolff, 2008; Gunderson, 1989; Kidd and Shannon, 1996). We have to keep this in mind when using specifications with hierarchical levels in the subsequent estimates.…”
Section: Econometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, using matched worker-firm data for about 130,000 employees and 14,000 employers, Jellal, Nordman and Wolff (2008) show that accounting for firm-related characteristics significantly reduces the gender earnings gap at the top of the distribution, but the gender gap still remains much higher at the top than at the bottom. On the other hand, using a large sample of employees working in a French private company from the Defense and Aerospace sector, Barnet-Verzat and Wolff (2008) obtain a gender wage gap of about 8% when controlling for age, experience, qualification and location, which remains rather flat along the wage distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%