1996
DOI: 10.1080/03637759609376398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered politics and presidential image construction: A reassessment of the “feminine style”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous examinations of contemporary political rhetoric that have generally uncovered discourse utilizing either a feminine style or some combination of masculine and feminine styles (e.g., Blankenship & Robson, 1995;DeRosa & Bystrom, 1999;Johnson, 2005;Kimble, 2009;Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles, 1996), our textual analysis uncovered few traces of feminine language use. Instead, policymakers and political commentators relied heavily on masculinely styled rhetoric; they projected an authoritative voice through declarative, data-driven arguments.…”
Section: Style Within the Immigration Reform Debatementioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike previous examinations of contemporary political rhetoric that have generally uncovered discourse utilizing either a feminine style or some combination of masculine and feminine styles (e.g., Blankenship & Robson, 1995;DeRosa & Bystrom, 1999;Johnson, 2005;Kimble, 2009;Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles, 1996), our textual analysis uncovered few traces of feminine language use. Instead, policymakers and political commentators relied heavily on masculinely styled rhetoric; they projected an authoritative voice through declarative, data-driven arguments.…”
Section: Style Within the Immigration Reform Debatementioning
confidence: 55%
“…, political movements (Hayden, 2003;Peeples & DeLuca, 2006;Tonn, 1996), Congressional policymaking (Blankenship & Robson, 1995), political debates (Banwart & McKinney, 2005;Johnson, 2005), convention speeches (DeRosa & Bystrom, 1999), and presidential campaign films (Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles, 1996. Understanding how political communication operates in American democracy demands an appreciation of how gender and style play out in our political process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Aussi, nous croyons qu'en période électorale, en raison de la polarisation des discours, les cadrages pourraient être plus radicaux, situés davantage dans une logique d'opposition et d'attaque ou de politique de type horse race (Parry-Giles et Parry-Giles, 1996). Bien que notre recherche ne porte pas sur les campagnes électorales ou les courses à la chefferie, nous croyons qu'identifier les cadrages présents dans ce type de période pourrait aider à comprendre comment s'articule la médiatisation des politicien(ne)s du Québec et du Canada.…”
Section: Discussion Et Conclusionunclassified
“…Past analysis of campaign discourse from a feminine style perspective (Dow & Tonn, 1993;Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles, 1996) has not examined differences among candidates' discourse. This is an important issue to address for several reasons.…”
Section: Campaign Discourse and Specific Groups Of Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 98%