2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
111
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
111
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on online dating allows for an examination of who approaches and rejects whom during the dating process [55,56]. Online dating enables users to indicate the racial/ethnic preference of potential matches with little or no social consequences, thereby increasing the likelihood that these revealed preferences indicate true racial/ethnic preferences in dating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on online dating allows for an examination of who approaches and rejects whom during the dating process [55,56]. Online dating enables users to indicate the racial/ethnic preference of potential matches with little or no social consequences, thereby increasing the likelihood that these revealed preferences indicate true racial/ethnic preferences in dating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, when no racial/ethnic preferences are stated, preferences can be inferred from the likelihood of interacting with potential matches with various racial/ethnic characteristics. Focusing on the stated preferences of White men and Black women, Black women were more likely to include White men as possible matches than White men were to include them [55]. Next, the examination of behaviors (initiating contact, and responding or not to emails) show that online daters without stated racial/ethnic preferences exhibit racial/ethnic biases in their behaviors [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Yahoo personal ads, one study shows that black, Hispanic, and Asian straight men are more likely than white men to have a racial preference for a partner ðPhua and Kaufman 2003Þ. Using data from the same source, a study comparing white men and women dat-ers shows that white women were most likely to exclude Asian men from their dating preferences while white men were most likely to exclude black women ðFeliciano, Robnett, and Komaie 2009;Robnett and Feliciano 2011Þ. Another study shows that Hispanic daters are more open to dating either whites or blacks than either group is to date one another ðFeliciano, Lee, and Robnett 2011Þ. Finally, profile data from match.com show that older cohorts are less willing to date anyone outside their racial group except whites.…”
Section: Interracial Dating and Cohabitation: New Trends And Implicatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men tend to have generally more prejudices towards outgroup members than women (e.g., Pratto, Sidanius, & Levin, 2006), which might be accompanied by more negative attitudes towards intergroup marriages. However, it is difficult to make an unequivocal prediction on gender differences in the attitude towards dating members of other ethnic groups.For example, a study by Tucker and Mitchell-Kernan (1995) in California found that Black, White and Latino men had considerably more often than women from these groups engaged in interethnic dating (see also Feliciano, Robnett, & Komaie, 2009 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%