Research Handbook on Gender and Innovation 2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781783478132.00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Gendered social innovation’: a new research stream for gender-inclusive innovation policy, research and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studied preschools' focus on gender and other stereotypical norms in their remodeling process shares similarities with previously identified aspirations of gender equality in social innovation processes (cf. Lindberg et al, 2015;Lindberg and Berglund, 2016). This concerns their identification of unfulfilled needs for improved gender equality in the preschool context, and their development of new solutions that serve to diminish segregation, hierarchies, and stereotyped notions of gender in the preschool operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studied preschools' focus on gender and other stereotypical norms in their remodeling process shares similarities with previously identified aspirations of gender equality in social innovation processes (cf. Lindberg et al, 2015;Lindberg and Berglund, 2016). This concerns their identification of unfulfilled needs for improved gender equality in the preschool context, and their development of new solutions that serve to diminish segregation, hierarchies, and stereotyped notions of gender in the preschool operations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bushouse, 2009;Cherney and Dempsey, 2010;Clark, 2010;Lindahl and Folkesson, 2012;MacNaughton, 2000;Sheridan et al, 2011;Skelton et al, 2006;Yelland, 2005). Some studies of social innovation have highlighted aspirations for gender equality in such processes, pinpointing the identification of unfulfilled needs for greater gender equality in various contexts (Cukier, 2018;Johnson Ross and Goddard, 2015;Lindberg et al, 2015;Lindberg and Berglund, 2016). They have also analyzed the development of new solutions that serve to diminish segregating, hierarchical, and stereotyped notions of gender in organizations and communities.…”
Section: Social Innovation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the combined insights from studies on gender in innovation and social innovation, the concept of 'gendered social innovation' has been elaborated in order to enhance the knowledge development regarding gendered transformation in innovation systems (Lindberg et al, 2015;Lindberg and Berglund, 2016). It refers to the identification of gender inequality as a societal and organizational challenge in regard to specific areas such as employment, education or entrepreneurship, as a basis for developing innovative solutions that counteract segregating and hierarchical patterns of gender in these areas.…”
Section: Gendered Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And since the platforms aim at improved knowledge and practices on gender equality, they also reflect previous research on 'gendered social innovation' (cf. Lindberg et al, 2015;Lindberg and Berglund, 2016). Specific forms of social innovation, perceivable in The Gender Academy and Gender Contact Point, are new cooperations in terms of researcher and stakeholder networks, new processes in terms of the joint development of new knowledge and measures, new methods in terms of knowledge-based gender equality measures, as well as new services in terms of digital tools for guiding gender equality measures (cf.…”
Section: Co-creative Forms and Forumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining conclusions from the two subfields of gendered innovation and social innovation, Lindberg et al (2015) as well as Lindberg and Berglund (2016) elaborate 'gendered social innovation' as a theoretical and practical concept. The ambition is to acknowledge and address gendered delimitations and potentials of socially innovative processes.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%