North American life course research has typically focused on micro/meso level contexts, and how these shape men's and women's lives. There has been less attention to societal laws and policies in analyses of gendered life courses. In contrast, Europeans have typically neglected gender and interdependence among lives, concentrating on analyses of how the state shapes trajectories. We argue that the consideration of demographic context and the role of laws and policies can help bridge the continental divide in life course approaches. In focusing on these two macro-level structural factors, it is unavoidable to acknowledge that families are critical mediators between society and individuals. We show that demographic shifts are creating new late life potential and new opportunities for intergenerational connections. Demographic change also increases differences between men's and women's networks and lives. We discuss so-called intergenerational policy regimes and show how they strengthen autonomy versus interdependence in families. Our review of legal changes reveals gender convergence in life structuring. Yet, we also observe strong contrasts between how men and women actually live their lives. Most likely, new understanding of this complex picture can be found in the intersection of macro-and micro perspectives. It is more important than ever that we 28 bridge a "continental divide" between research communities, across countries and methodological camps.
Keywords
Our Point of DepartureSince both authors have studied and worked in Europe as well as in North America, it is natural for us to take a comparative view, exploring contrasts and similarities between European and North American perspectives. We start from two basic premises: First, life course studies are a perfect arena in which to raise and seek solutions to some fundamental analytical puzzles that have faced social scientists since the start of our disciplines. Central among them are relationships among levels and units of analysis. Among major figures in classic social science, Durkheim, through his emphasis on social facts, took the clearest stance with regard to levels: "…collective life does not derive from individual life…, [and] the latter cannot explain the former (Durkheim, 1895(Durkheim, /1982. Second, we have a much better chance of building new insights, filling knowledge gaps, and solving analytical puzzles if we have international dialogues and collaboration across research communities.
29After a brief historical overview of approaches to the life course on two continents (section 2), we highlight some classic work on men's and women's lives and raise the issue of whether life course scholars on two continents have met the empirical and analytical challenges of analyzing how gendered life courses are shaped by cultural expectations as well as contrasting positions in society (section 3). We ask: To what extent do macro-level forces create different patterns of interdependence, divergent and contrasting life trajectories for men a...