2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene-based SSR markers for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) derived from root and leaf tissue ESTs: an integration of the BMc series

Abstract: BackgroundSequencing of cDNA libraries for the development of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) as well as for the discovery of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) has been a common method of developing microsatellites or SSR-based markers. In this research, our objective was to further sequence and develop common bean microsatellites from leaf and root cDNA libraries derived from the Andean gene pool accession G19833 and the Mesoamerican gene pool accession DOR364, mapping parents of a commonly used reference map. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
68
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the unigene-SSRs based on longer motifs such as tetra-and penta-nucleotide repeat motifs were found to be polymorphic, suggesting that long-motif SSRs are also useful for generating informative markers. The polymorphism level of the SSR markers in this study was comparable to other studies (Blair et al 2011;Mishra et al 2012). Moreover, 39 SSR loci matched known genes, which were involved in different functional types of proteins and would assist in identifying marker trait association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, the unigene-SSRs based on longer motifs such as tetra-and penta-nucleotide repeat motifs were found to be polymorphic, suggesting that long-motif SSRs are also useful for generating informative markers. The polymorphism level of the SSR markers in this study was comparable to other studies (Blair et al 2011;Mishra et al 2012). Moreover, 39 SSR loci matched known genes, which were involved in different functional types of proteins and would assist in identifying marker trait association.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Despite the inherent limitations of analysis based on di-nucleotides, such as difficulties in interpretation due to stuttering and low detection power for alleles that differ by a few base pairs even when using high-resolution electrophoresis, genotyping based on di-nucleotide repeats still predominates among plants due to their high abundance and ease of identification in the genomes. More recently, because of efforts in genomic sequencing and the availability of expressed sequence tag databanks, a greater number of tri-nucleotide markers are being developed (Blair et al, 2011).…”
Section: Characterization Of Microsatellite Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three possible reasons for these differences: (1) the use of different number of Cymbidium accessions during polymorphic screening, (2) only 39.3% of designed primers (not all primers) can be screened in the EST-SSRs, and (3) polymorphic primer pairs may be selected by chance while primer selection, although they were selected proportionally according to their repeat motifs types. In comparison, amplification with non-gene based microsatellites is prone to some pitfalls for AT-rich hybridization-derived genomic microsatellites (Blair et al 2011). Differences between genic and other types of genomic microsatellites have been observed in marker sets of other crops Hanai et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%