1988
DOI: 10.1128/jb.170.9.3983-3990.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene clusters for S fimbrial adhesin (sfa) and F1C fimbriae (foc) of Escherichia coli: comparative aspects of structure and function

Abstract: Fimbrial adhesins enable bacteria to attach to eucaryotic cells. The genetic determinants for S fimbrial adhesins (sfa) and for FlC ("pseudotype I") fimbriae (foc) were compared. Sfa and FlC represent functionally distinct adhesins in their receptor specificities. Nevertheless, a high degree of homology between both determinants was found on the basis of DNA-DNA hybridizations. Characteristic differences in the restriction maps of the corresponding gene clusters, however, were visible in regions coding for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SfaS represents the specific adhesin binding to sialic acid (Morschhauser et al, 1990), whereas FIC fimbriae lack that specific adhesive property. The high degree of homology between the foe and sfa gene clusters was also found in previous studies (Ott et al, 1987(Ott et al, , 1988Riegman et al, 1990;Schmoll et al, in press). It strongly suggests that tlu!se gene clusters represent a family of adhesin determinants, as was observed for the P /Prs and the type 1 fimbrial adhesins ; in the P /Prs and type 1 fimbrial systems, adhesive properties have been designated for the large 35-kDa minor sub units (Lindberg et al, 1986;Klemm and Christians en , 1987;Lund et al, 1988;Riegman et al, 1988).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Foe Minor Subunit Proteins With Minor Protsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SfaS represents the specific adhesin binding to sialic acid (Morschhauser et al, 1990), whereas FIC fimbriae lack that specific adhesive property. The high degree of homology between the foe and sfa gene clusters was also found in previous studies (Ott et al, 1987(Ott et al, , 1988Riegman et al, 1990;Schmoll et al, in press). It strongly suggests that tlu!se gene clusters represent a family of adhesin determinants, as was observed for the P /Prs and the type 1 fimbrial adhesins ; in the P /Prs and type 1 fimbrial systems, adhesive properties have been designated for the large 35-kDa minor sub units (Lindberg et al, 1986;Klemm and Christians en , 1987;Lund et al, 1988;Riegman et al, 1988).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Foe Minor Subunit Proteins With Minor Protsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Genetically, FIC fimbriae have been shown to be very closely related to S fimbriae (Ott et al, 1987(Ott et al, , 1988Riegman et al, 1990). In both gene clusters, the distal part encodes minor fimbrial sub units (Hacker, 1989;Schmoll et al, 1989;Riegman et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This probe also detects foc specific sequences, encoding F1 C fimbriae. 17 The specific DNA probe for type 1 fimbriae gene clusters consisted of the 6.0 kb Pstl fragment of plasmid pPKL4 (Apr). 52 The aerobactin specific probe was a 7.0 kb Hindlli-Eco Rl fragment of plasmid pRG12 {Apr).…”
Section: Sos-pagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 For differentiation of sfa and foc gene clusters the 9 kb EcoRV fragment of pANN 801-13 was used as DNA probe in Southern hybridization experiments. 13 As specific D NA probe for type 1 fimbriae gene clusters the 6.0 kb Pstl fragment of plasmid pPKL4 (Ap 1 )…”
Section: Orthogonal Field Alternation Gel Electrophoresis (Ofage)mentioning
confidence: 99%