1981
DOI: 10.1038/292306a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast

Abstract: The mitotic recombination behaviour of a duplication of the his4 region on chromosome III in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was studied. The major recombination event between the duplicated segments is gene conversion unassociated with reciprocal recombination. The rad52-1 mutation preferentially decreases mitotic gene conversion. These results suggest that mitotic gene conversion may occur by a different pathway from that occurring in meiosis. This mitotic gene conversion may be important in yeast mating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
131
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we found that the RADI and RAD52 genes affect this recombination via different pathways, since the frequency of HIS3+ recombinants decreased synergistically in radi radS2 double mutants. Unlike rad52 mutations (12), however, radl mutations did not lower the recombination frequency of an intrachromosomal duplication of the his4 heteroalleles (alleles differing by point mutations) or the recombination frequency between heteroalleles on homologous chromosomes. Integration of linear plasmids and DNA fragments into homologous sites in the yeast chromosome was decreased by the radiA mutation, indicating that the RAD1 product acts at a stage after the formation of the recombinogenic substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Furthermore, we found that the RADI and RAD52 genes affect this recombination via different pathways, since the frequency of HIS3+ recombinants decreased synergistically in radi radS2 double mutants. Unlike rad52 mutations (12), however, radl mutations did not lower the recombination frequency of an intrachromosomal duplication of the his4 heteroalleles (alleles differing by point mutations) or the recombination frequency between heteroalleles on homologous chromosomes. Integration of linear plasmids and DNA fragments into homologous sites in the yeast chromosome was decreased by the radiA mutation, indicating that the RAD1 product acts at a stage after the formation of the recombinogenic substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…39 and 40), a process of unidirectional transfer of genetic material between members of a multigenic family (41). Gene conversion generates a transition from the heterozygous stage to the homozygous stage, and thus can result in substantial heterozygote deficiency (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to homologous recombination between single-copy sequences, unequal interhomolog and interchromatid recombination between duplicated sequences ( Figure 2) has been observed in yeast (JACKSON and FINK 1981;JACKSON and FINK 1985;KLEIN 1984;KLEIN and PETES 1981;MOTOVALI-BASHI et al 2004;SZOSTAK and Wu 1980;THOMPSON and STAHL 1999), tobacco (TOVAR and LICHTENSTEIN 1992) and Arabidopsis (ASSAAD and SIGNER 1992;JELESKO et al 1999;MOLINIER et al 2004;OPPERMAN et al 2004). Also similar to equal recombination, unequal interchromatid recombination predominated during mitosis in a study conducted in yeast (JACKSON and FINK 1981), whereas unequal interhomolog recombination was preferred in meiosis (JACKSON and FINK 1985).…”
Section: Meiotic Recombination Among Tandemly Arrayed Duplicate Genessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Also similar to equal recombination, unequal interchromatid recombination predominated during mitosis in a study conducted in yeast (JACKSON and FINK 1981), whereas unequal interhomolog recombination was preferred in meiosis (JACKSON and FINK 1985). Together these results suggest that equal and unequal recombination occur via similar mechanisms (i.e., DSBR).…”
Section: Meiotic Recombination Among Tandemly Arrayed Duplicate Genesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation