2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-006-0113-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene conversion in human rearranged immunoglobulin genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, several of these upstream donor genes are functional, whereas in chickens there exists a single functional germline VH and a pool of upstream pseudogenes that are used exclusively as donor genes for gene conversion. Interestingly, and consistent with earlier data [47], we report a detectable amount of gene conversion in the human IgG repertoire, but not in the mouse. The gene conversion tract lengths are significantly lower in the expressed human IgG repertoire as compared to the rabbit and chicken, but nonetheless are of high statistical confidence (p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, several of these upstream donor genes are functional, whereas in chickens there exists a single functional germline VH and a pool of upstream pseudogenes that are used exclusively as donor genes for gene conversion. Interestingly, and consistent with earlier data [47], we report a detectable amount of gene conversion in the human IgG repertoire, but not in the mouse. The gene conversion tract lengths are significantly lower in the expressed human IgG repertoire as compared to the rabbit and chicken, but nonetheless are of high statistical confidence (p<0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In rabbits, 23% of IgG sequences and 32% of Igκ sequences were the products of gene conversion. There have been previous, although somewhat controversial, indications suggesting gene conversion occurs in humans and mice as well, albeit at a much lower frequency [47], [48], [49]. We find that, in the mouse, putative gene conversion events are nearly absent, with an estimated frequency of 0.1% of all unique IgG sequences.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…The high concentration of somatic mutations in these few RGYW motifs indicated that the motifs likely targeted by AID is restricted in the catfish compared with that known in mammals. These results allowed the alternative hypothesis that hybrid formation was mediated by AID to be pursued (12, 2728, 31). If revision occurred via an initiating AID-induced DNA lesion, the targeted site would be expected to be within the junctional boundary where the recipient and donor shared the same sequence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As suggested by earlier studies, if the heptamers in both the donor cRSS and the recipient cRSS are in the same orientation and the same relative coding region locations, then a RAG-mediated recombination event that results in a hybrid joint could yield a functional and apparently seamless revision product (2628). Alternatively, it has been postulated that receptor revision might result from an AID-dependent, gene conversion type event (12, 27, 28, 31). The mechanisms, the frequency, and the location where revisions may occur present major challenges in understanding the potential biological significance of receptor revision in B cell populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, gene conversion machinery commonly appears active across cell types or species, as a DSB can induce homology-directed repair in an I-SceI site-containing reporter gene in different cells. Nevertheless, AID-induced lesions rarely cause immunoglobulin gene conversion in human B cells, despite the presence of multiple pseudo-V genes in humans (46). Although it remains uncertain whether an Ig gene conversion-specific enzyme that acts downstream of AID or DSB exists, such an enzyme might contribute to the DSB-induced gene conversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%