2013
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.146522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Copy-Number Variation in Haploid and Diploid Strains of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: The increasing ability to sequence and compare multiple individual genomes within a species has highlighted the fact that copy-number variation (CNV) is a substantial and underappreciated source of genetic diversity. Chromosome-scale mutations occur at rates orders of magnitude higher than base substitutions, yet our understanding of the mechanisms leading to CNVs has been lagging. We examined CNV in a region of chromosome 5 (chr5) in haploid and diploid strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We optimized a CNV … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of CUP1 copies varies among naturally isolated wild and vineyard strains (between 1 and 18 copies among 14 wild strains, Zhao et al 2014, and 4 and 18 copies among 15 Italian vineyard strains, Stroobants et al 2008). As CUP1 is present in the ancestral genome as a tandem repeat, it is likely prone to alterations in copy number as a consequence of unequal crossover, gene conversion, or single-strand annealing (Zhang et al 2013). Furthermore, CUP1 amplification seems to incur few pleiotropic costs, as seen by the lack of an observed effect of CUP1 copy number on growth rate in YPD among our tetrad lines (Table S7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of CUP1 copies varies among naturally isolated wild and vineyard strains (between 1 and 18 copies among 14 wild strains, Zhao et al 2014, and 4 and 18 copies among 15 Italian vineyard strains, Stroobants et al 2008). As CUP1 is present in the ancestral genome as a tandem repeat, it is likely prone to alterations in copy number as a consequence of unequal crossover, gene conversion, or single-strand annealing (Zhang et al 2013). Furthermore, CUP1 amplification seems to incur few pleiotropic costs, as seen by the lack of an observed effect of CUP1 copy number on growth rate in YPD among our tetrad lines (Table S7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first assay was designed to characterize the LOH effect observed in the mutation accumulation experiment described above. We used isogenic diploids ( Figure 1; Table S1) that were homozygous at all positions on Chr7, except that they contained a single hemizygous copy of the CORE2 counter-selectable cassette with two diverged orthologous copies of the URA3 gene and a marker for geneticin resistance (Zhang et al 2013) inserted near the right end of Chr7. An allelic interhomolog recombination event occurring anywhere within the 575-kb region between CEN7 and the CORE2 insertion can result in LOH that may cause a diploid to become homozygous for the distal regions of the right arm of Chr7.…”
Section: Chromosome Instability As Measured By Lohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 60,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between two strains' genomes, some of which are associated with restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) that can be used to monitor recombination between homologous chromosomes. For the isogenic and hybrid LOH assays, the CORE2 cassette containing the Kluyveromyces lactis URA3 gene, the S. cerevisiae URA3 gene, and the kanMX geneticin resistance gene was amplified from plasmid pJA40 (Zhang et al 2013) and integrated at chromosome 7 (Chr7) downstream of the MAL13 gene (distal side), 20 kb from the right telomere. For the NAHR assay, we used a PCR-based approach to delete a 180-bp segment spanning the 39 end of the open reading frame (ORF) and the immediate downstream sequence of the URA3 gene at its native position on Chr5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genomic DNA preparation, labeling, hybridization, and data analysis procedures were as described earlier (Zhang et al 2013). …”
Section: Chromosome Copy Number Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%