2004
DOI: 10.1089/107632704322791934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Delivery in Bone Tissue Engineering: Progress and Prospects Using Viral and Nonviral Strategies

Abstract: Bone tissue loss as a consequence of the natural aging process or as a result of trauma and degenerative disease has led to the need for procedures to generate cartilage and bone for a variety of orthopedic applications. The ability to transfer genes into multipotential mesenchymal stem cells, while still in its infancy, offers considerable therapeutic hope in a variety of musculoskeletal disorders. However, the choice of gene delivery method is key. This review examines the various techniques and methods curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
86
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10]40 The most powerful and easiest vector administration would be percutaneous in vivo injection of adenoviruses, but disadvantages, including lack of control over the target cell population and risks associated with direct viral inoculation, suggest development of other methods. rAAV has advantages over other viral and nonviral gene therapies, such as a lower potential of adverse events and higher efficiency, respectively, [18][19][20] but requires refinement for clinical usage as delivery systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8][9][10]40 The most powerful and easiest vector administration would be percutaneous in vivo injection of adenoviruses, but disadvantages, including lack of control over the target cell population and risks associated with direct viral inoculation, suggest development of other methods. rAAV has advantages over other viral and nonviral gene therapies, such as a lower potential of adverse events and higher efficiency, respectively, [18][19][20] but requires refinement for clinical usage as delivery systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant viral vectors are particularly effective. [8][9][10] However, combining viral vectors with biomaterials has not been fully explored. One of the most promising delivery methods incorporates viral vectors in a polymer matrix with release controlled by polymer degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These vectors, however, elicit an immune response and have a limited duration of expression. 4,26 New generations of vectors have been generated to address these limitations. Among these, adeno-associated viruses appear promising as they do not encode for inflammatory viral proteins 26,[42][43][44] and have successfully been applied to stimulate osteogenesis in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] So far, the most efficient and commonly used vectors for gene delivery have been viruses. 4 Viral vectors have been administered to skeletal sites in animals, mainly by local injections in vasculature trunks, 5 muscle, [6][7][8][9] natural cavities (e.g. joints and synovial spaces) [10][11][12][13][14] and in postsurgical, traumatic or congenital areas of bone defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been widespread concern over gene therapy because plasmid DNA could be introduced into cells of patients in gene therapy, to express the pharmaceutical proteins [1,2]. Gene therapy provides remarkable potential for the treatment of many genetic and non-genetic disorders, but the clinical application of this technology is severely hindered by the lack of an efficient and safe gene delivery system [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%