The Merck Childhood Asthma Network, Inc conference titled "State of Childhood Asthma and Future Directions: Strategies for Implementing Best Practices" was held December 13 to 14, 2006. Here we summarize the presentations and recommendations for systems approaches from that conference and discuss current asthma care. Pediatrics 2009;123:S211-S214 T HE ARTICLES IN this supplement summarize the presentations and recommendations made at the Merck Childhood Asthma Network, Inc conference titled "State of Childhood Asthma and Future Directions: Strategies for Implementing Best Practices," which was held December 13-14, 2006, in Washington DC. In addition, they explore the multidimensional array of issues related to asthma causes, epidemiological features, and care, as well as highlighting a series of new and missed opportunities to improve the quality of life for children with asthma. As we discuss, our current system for treating childhood asthma can be aptly described by the adage, "the system is perfectly designed to get the results that it does." We conclude that improving asthma outcomes for children requires taking a more systematic approach that includes implementation of evidence-based, highquality care. Given the prevalence of childhood asthma and its associated burden, implementing a systems approach to preventing the disease and improving outcomes for children with asthma ought to be a national priority. To start, we need to consider what the system would comprise.
SYSTEMS APPROACH TO DISEASE PREVENTIONAny serious attempt at system change begins with measurement, which suggests that we need a reliable surveillance mechanism that can measure asthma incidence and prevalence and identify geographic and population-level patterns ("outbreaks") or increases in morbidity in an actionable time frame. Such data need to be collected and evaluated not only on a national scale but also for individual states and communities, because many of the factors that are related to asthma outcomes can be influenced by local action. Although funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to develop and to implement multiple local surveillance efforts 1 is a step in the right direction, significant additional funding is necessary to develop a comprehensive public health approach that can achieve positive effects. Since 2001, the United States has made significant investments in surveillance systems for bioterrorism agents and pandemic influenza. Many of these systems use emergency department and inpatient claims data or school absenteeism data; the fact that these data sources are not also used to monitor asthma morbidity is a missed opportunity for asthma surveillance.In 1999, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention undertook an initiative to monitor and to control childhood asthma. The resulting surveillance data came from a combination of survey and hospital discharge data. If expanded and made more timely, these data could be suitable for monitoring progress in asthma prevention and management. As i...