2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01771-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression profiling: monitoring transcription and translation products using DNA microarrays and proteomics

Abstract: Novel and powerful technologies such as DNA microarrays and proteomics have made possible the analysis of the expression levels of multiple genes simultaneously both in health and disease. In combination, these technologies promise to revolutionize biology, in particular in the area of molecular medicine as they are expected to reveal gene regulation events involved in disease progression as well as to pinpoint potential targets for drug discovery and diagnostics. Here, we review the current status of these te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(203 reference statements)
1
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The following criteria were used to identify such genes: (a) there must be at least a 2-fold change in message level as compared with untreated control; (b) the hybridization intensity must be above 100 arbitrary units so as to exclude weak signals; (c) the standard deviation between experiments must be less than 100% of the relative intensity so as to exclude genes that did not change in a consistent manner in the several independent experiments. These are similar to criteria used in several other studies (13,14). Based on these criteria, 38 genes including MDR1 were identified (Table I), which is ϳ2% of the genes sampled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following criteria were used to identify such genes: (a) there must be at least a 2-fold change in message level as compared with untreated control; (b) the hybridization intensity must be above 100 arbitrary units so as to exclude weak signals; (c) the standard deviation between experiments must be less than 100% of the relative intensity so as to exclude genes that did not change in a consistent manner in the several independent experiments. These are similar to criteria used in several other studies (13,14). Based on these criteria, 38 genes including MDR1 were identified (Table I), which is ϳ2% of the genes sampled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Cells were treated with the peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates, with the Ant peptide itself, or were maintained as untreated controls. Thereafter, message levels from 2059 genes were assessed using commercial, oligonucleotide-based DNA array technology (13,14). In addition to the expected decrease in MDR1 message level, 37 additional genes displayed changes that were regarded as significant in comparing the three experimental conditions with the control situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we observed normal staining with the CK7 antibody in all the lesions showing this type of heterogeneity. Recently, we reported changes in the levels of CK8 in some invasive TCCs because of protein degradation (14), and we cannot exclude the possibility that this mechanism may play a role in the generation of type 3 heterogeneity.…”
Section: Type 1 Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In our laboratories we are applying gene expression profiling technologies in combination with immunohistochemistry to reveal bladder cancer heterogeneity with the long term aim of predicting the biological behavior of these lesions in terms of recurrence and progression (13)(14)(15). An important milestone of these studies has been the establishment of proteomic databases of various bladder tissue compartments (urothelium, TCCs, squamous cell carcinomas, muscle, connective tissue), as well as of urine and plasma (biobase.dk/ cgi-bin/celis; see Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass spectrometry and/or 2D PAGE Western immunoblotting confirmed the identity of selected proteins. In short, for mass spectrometry, protein spots were cut out from the dry gel with the aid of the corresponding x-ray film and were prepared as described previously (35,37,38). All MALDI-MS measurements were performed using a Bruker Reflex III MALDI-TOF-MS (Bruker Daltonik GmbH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%