2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene flow between introduced and native Eucalyptus species: Flowering asynchrony as a barrier to F1 hybridisation between exotic E. nitens and native Tasmanian Symphyomyrtus species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of morphological monitoring programs aimed at the identification of F 1 hybrids will therefore be an effective tool for identifying sites and species at risk of introgression of exotic plantation genes. In the current example, the likelihood of hybridisation between plantation grown E. nitens and natural populations of E. cordata is low, due the existence of barriers to F 1 hybridisation such as spatial isolation and flowering asynchrony (BAR-BOUR, 2004b;BARBOUR et al, 2005;BARBOUR et al, 2006). The cross combinations produced using the pollen from this F 1 hybrid cross-type, however, have clearly demonstrated the difficulties in identifying second-generation hybrids compared to first-generation (F 1 ) hybrids from pure parental species based on morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The development of morphological monitoring programs aimed at the identification of F 1 hybrids will therefore be an effective tool for identifying sites and species at risk of introgression of exotic plantation genes. In the current example, the likelihood of hybridisation between plantation grown E. nitens and natural populations of E. cordata is low, due the existence of barriers to F 1 hybridisation such as spatial isolation and flowering asynchrony (BAR-BOUR, 2004b;BARBOUR et al, 2005;BARBOUR et al, 2006). The cross combinations produced using the pollen from this F 1 hybrid cross-type, however, have clearly demonstrated the difficulties in identifying second-generation hybrids compared to first-generation (F 1 ) hybrids from pure parental species based on morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Various authors have suggested that heat sum may be involved in the year-to-year or site-to-27 site variation in annual anthesis time in eucalypts (Ashton 1975;Barbour et al 2006;28 Birtchnell and Gibson 2006;Griffin 1980;Moncur et al 1994;Pryor 1976). Indeed, when 29 comparing trees for which there was a complete five year flowering record, the mean heatthat the large between year variation in peak anthesis time of these trees of up to 30 days 1 appear to have been caused by year to year fluctuation in temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This detectable contamination, although small, highlights the potential for eucalypt pollen to travel significant distances (e.g. BARBOUR et al, 2002;BYRNE et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Eucalyptus nitens is pollinated by insects (HINGSTON et al, 2004) and its pollen is mainly deposited within short distances, however, it has the potential to move long distances (BARBOUR et al, 2005). Gene flow from native forest into E. nitens plantings (and also the contrary) has been demonstrated (BARBOUR et al, 2002). This highlights the risk of pollen contamination if inadequate buffers between orchard and cross compatible native or plantation eucalypts are used.…”
Section: Microsatellite Based Paternity Analysis In a Clonal Eucalyptmentioning
confidence: 99%