1992
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330890405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene geography of South America: Testing models of population displacement based on archeological evidence

Abstract: Gene frequencies for 13 marker systems are used to construct synthetic gene frequency maps of South America. The surfaces generated using the first three principal components exhibit clines which validate models of population displacement based on archeological data and a previous analysis of craniometrical variation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies, including multivariate analyses comparing the gene frequency of several blood proteins and the HLA system, and dermatoglyphic, craniometrical and morphological features with linguistic and geographic/climatic variables, have produced controversial results [1, 57, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. In contrast, our DNA marker data demonstrate that there exist significant genetic differences between the Amazon, the Andean and Southern natives for RFLP-mtDNA, whereas the differences in the Y-specific markers between Andean and Amazon natives are low, although the number of males studied is still too small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies, including multivariate analyses comparing the gene frequency of several blood proteins and the HLA system, and dermatoglyphic, craniometrical and morphological features with linguistic and geographic/climatic variables, have produced controversial results [1, 57, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. In contrast, our DNA marker data demonstrate that there exist significant genetic differences between the Amazon, the Andean and Southern natives for RFLP-mtDNA, whereas the differences in the Y-specific markers between Andean and Amazon natives are low, although the number of males studied is still too small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Y chromosome and mtDNA variation patterns do not permit a clear conclusion as to whether the Andean Quechua and Aymara populations are derived from the Amazon population [63, 64], or if they represent two independently differentiated Amerindian populations, one located in the Andes region and the other in the tropical forest [65]. Previous studies, including multivariate analyses comparing the gene frequency of several blood proteins and the HLA system, and dermatoglyphic, craniometrical and morphological features with linguistic and geographic/climatic variables, have produced controversial results [1, 57, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly since the 1990s, population genetic studies have taken a keen interest in the indigenous populations of the Americas, given their unique demographic background (Schurr et al, 1990;Rothhammer and Silva, 1992;Torroni et al, 1992). The Americas were the last major continents to be settled by humans, probably by a small founding population around 15-17 kya (Tamm et al, 2007;Fagundes et al, 2008;Kitchen et al, 2008), yet they are home to surprisingly wide cultural and linguistic diversity (Nettle, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main scenarios have been proposed to explain the migration history: 1) a single migration along the coastal side of the Andes from which later groups spread out across the continent (Bennett and Bird 1964;Salzano and Callegari-Jacques 1988), and 2) an earlier split of the source population, possibly in the 4 northern area of South America that resulted in separate coastal and inland/continental populations (Bodner et al 2012;Hubbe et al 2010;Neves et al 2003). Early genetic studies supported the second of these scenarios, two distinct populations based on the genetic patterns between Andean and Amazonian groups (Luiselli et al 2000;Monsalve et al 1994;Rothhammer and Silva 1992). However, it is important to note that the presence of genetic structuring does not imply separate migration events (Fuselli et al 2003;Lewis et al 2007;Wang et al 2007) and studies have pointed out the possible underestimation of the impact from European contact that depopulated the region and likely led to a drastic genetic bottleneck (Lewis and Long 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%