Gene Mutations and Treatment Outcome in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results From the CLL8 Trial

Abstract

433 Novel gene mutations have been found in CLL by next generation sequencing including mutations of NOTCH1 and SF3B1 in 5–20% of cases. In initial studies, both have been associated with advanced disease and poor outcome. We assessed the incidence and impact of gene mutations in the CLL8 trial (1st line FC vs. FCR, n=817). TP53 (exons 2–11) was analyzed by a re-sequencing chip (Amplichip, Roche Molecular Systems) with confirmatory Sanger sequencing. NOTCH1 was analyzed by Sanger sequencing exon 34, chr9:139,390,619–139,391,290 (PEST domain). SF3B1 (exons 13–16) was analyzed by DHPLC (WAVE® 3500HT, Transgenomic Inc.) with subsequent Sanger sequencing. Baseline samples were available for analysis of genetic markers in 619 (75.8%) to 645 (78.9%) patients. All markers were available for 573 (70.1%) patients and this cohort was representative of the full trial population. Mutations (mut) were found in TP53, NOTCH1, and SF3B1 in 11.5%, 10.0%, and 18.4%, respectively. At least one mutation was identified in 35.2% patients, while 30.6% had one, 4.4% had two and 0.2% had three mutations. Concurrent NOTCH1mut and SF3B1mut were found in only 0.5% patients. TP53mut was observed in 16.7% of NOTCH1mut cases (p=.528) and in 14.5% of SF3B1mut patients (p=.472). Regarding baseline characteristics, there were significant associations of TP53mut with CIRS>1, unmutated IGHV and 17p-; of NOTCH1mut with Binet A/B, no B-symptoms, unmutated IGHV, and 17p-; and of SF3B1mut with TK>10, and no +12. Regarding response to therapy, TP53mut was significantly associated with refractory disease in both arms (FCR: 25.0% vs. 1.8%, p<.001, FC: 48.4% vs. 7.8%, p<.001,); while NOTCH1mut showed only a trend in the FCR arm (FCR: 10.9% vs. 3.4%, p=.109, FC: 11.9% vs. 12.9%, p=.775); and SF3B1mut did not impact response to therapy (FCR: 3.6% vs. 3.7%, p=1.00, FC: 12.3% vs. 10.9%, p=1.00). At extended follow-up (median 69.97 months), FCR resulted into significantly improved PFS (HR 0.586, p<.001) and OS (HR 0.678, p=.001). TP53mut was associated in both treatment arms with significantly decreased PFS (FC: HR 4.295, p<.001; FCR: HR 3.173 p<.001) and OS (FC: HR 4.642 p<.001; FCR: HR 4.447, p<.001). In contrast, NOTCH1mut was only in the FCR arm associated with significantly decreased PFS (FC: HR 0.931, p=.741; FCR: HR 1.718, p=.013) and a trend to inferior OS (FC: HR 0.854, p=.605; FCR: HR 1.610, p=.112). SF3B1mut was associated in both treatment arms with significantly decreased PFS (FC: HR 1.520, p=.009; FCR: HR 1.463, p=.033) and a trend to inferior OS (FC: HR 1.338, p=.178; FCR: HR 1.305, p=.301). To evaluate the independent prognostic impact, we performed multivariable analyses by Cox regression for PFS and OS including the following variables: treatment, age, sex, stage, ECOG status, B-symptoms, WBC, TK, β2-MG, 11q-, +12, 13q-, 17p-, IGHV, TP53, NOTCH1 and SF3B1. Regarding PFS, the following independent prognostic factors were identified: FCR (HR 0.510, p<.001), TK>10 (HR 1.367, p=.019), IGHV<98% (HR 1.727, p<.001), 11q- (HR 1.536, p<.001), 17p- (HR 2.949 p<.001), TP53mut (HR 2.113 p<.001), and SF3B1mut (HR 1.348, p=.024). Regarding OS, the following independent prognostic factors were identified: FCR (HR 0.701, p=.049), ECOG>0 (HR 2.202, p<.001), TK>10 (HR 2.707, p<.001), IGHV<98% (HR 1.547, p=.055), 17p- (HR 3.546 p<.001) and TP53mut (HR 3.032 p<.001). To identify a predictive impact of gene mutations for a specific treatment effect by the addition of rituximab, we performed multivariable analyses including the treatment arms, the gene mutations and the interaction of both. Regarding PFS, FCR (HR 0.544, p<.001), TP53mut (HR 3.607, p<.001), SF3B1mut (HR 1.355, p=.012) and NOTCH1mut interaction with FCR (HR 1.652, p=.022) were identified as independent factors. Regarding OS, FCR (HR 0.654, p=.002) and TP53mut (HR 4.470, p<.001) were identified as independent factors while NOTCH1mut interaction with FCR (HR 1.331, p=.344) showed a trend. The interaction between NOTCH1mut and FCR treatment is illustrated in univariate PFS analysis, in which the addition of rituximab led to a benefit only among patients without NOTCH1mut (Figure). In conclusion, gene mutations show independent prognostic value for PFS (TP53, SF3B1) and OS (TP53) in patients receiving 1st line FC and FCR treatment. Of note, NOTCH1mut appears to identify a subset of CLL patients that does not benefit from the addition of rituximab to FC. Disclosures: Stilgenbauer: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Patten:Roche: Employment. Wenger:Roche: Employment. Mendila:Roche: Employment. Hallek:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Major prognostic value of complex karyotype in addition to TP53 and IGHV mutational status in first‐line chronic lymphocytic leukemia

“…CK was significantly associated with TP53 disruption, ATM deletions, del(6q), and IGHV UM status. Indeed, in univariate analysis, CK stood out as a significant poor prognosis marker both for PFS and OS and remained significant in multivariate analysis, together, as expected, with TP53 disruption and IGHV UM. No other molecular anomaly impacted survival, at variance from the CLL8 trial where NOTCH1 and SF3B1 carried a prognostic value …”

“…Compared with first‐line therapy CLL studies, the cytogenetic and molecular defects observed in this cohort are at similar frequencies, except for SF3B1 mutations, much lower in our cohort. Of note, these data are different than reported in other studies, most likely because they included heterogeneous series of patients.…”

Low‐dose alemtuzumab in refractory/relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Genetic profile and long‐term outcome from a single center experience

“…Among other biological poor risk factors, neither NOTCH1 nor SF3B1 mutations negatively impacted on ORR, PFS and OS, suggesting the effectiveness of alemtuzumab also in these genetic categories of patients. NOTCH1 mutations were slightly more frequent in the subgroup of patients that relapsed after fludarabine‐cyclophosphamide‐rituximab immunochemotherapy ( P = 0.07), which is consistent with the recently reported association between NOTCH1 mutations and the resistance to anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibodies .…”

Single‐agent ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy regimens for treatment‐naïve patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A cross‐trial comparison of phase 3 studies

“…Notably, among ibrutinib‐treated patients in the pooled analysis, del(11q) was associated with a trend of longer PFS and OS compared with those without del(11q). This is in contrast with standard first‐line CIT with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, which has shown worse outcomes in patients with several high‐risk features . Together these data suggest that targeting intracellular B‐cell signaling by BTK inhibition with ibrutinib may be particularly beneficial in patients with features traditionally considered high‐risk, such as unmutated IGHV and del(11q), who may not be expected to respond well to standard CIT with fludarabine or bendamustine.…”