2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Networks in Plant Biology: Approaches in Reconstruction and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(129 reference statements)
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To optimize this step, the AUROC values of six correlation (PCC, SCC, KCC, GCC, BIC, and CSC) and four MI methods [additive ARACNE (AA), multiplicative ARACNE (MA), MRNET, and CLR) were compared for the expression matrices that were generated from each of three normalization methods (VST, CPM, and RPKM) and then averaged. In general, correlation methods are more computationally efficient whereas MI methods are able to reveal nonlinear relationships (Li et al, 2015c). PCC is widely used but may be influenced by outliers (Mukaka, 2012).…”
Section: Correlation Methods Perform Better Than MI At Some Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To optimize this step, the AUROC values of six correlation (PCC, SCC, KCC, GCC, BIC, and CSC) and four MI methods [additive ARACNE (AA), multiplicative ARACNE (MA), MRNET, and CLR) were compared for the expression matrices that were generated from each of three normalization methods (VST, CPM, and RPKM) and then averaged. In general, correlation methods are more computationally efficient whereas MI methods are able to reveal nonlinear relationships (Li et al, 2015c). PCC is widely used but may be influenced by outliers (Mukaka, 2012).…”
Section: Correlation Methods Perform Better Than MI At Some Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent work has made substantial progress toward describing genomewide expression patterns in many genotypes, environmental conditions, and tissues, relatively little is known about the function and regulation of most maize genes. Because genes with related biological functions or regulatory mechanisms often have similar expression patterns (Aoki et al, 2007), one way to enhance understanding of gene function is by construction of a gene coexpression network (GCN;D'haeseleer et al, 2000;Aoki et al, 2007;Usadel et al, 2009;Li et al, 2015c;Serin et al, 2016). GCNs are constructed using data mining tools and algorithms that describe the relatedness between the expression patterns of multiple genes in a pairwise fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome is the identification of groups of genes (modules) with similar expression behaviour, suggesting that they are under common transcriptional control. Modules (represented by module eigengenes) can be correlated with phenotypic variation to identify modules that may influence the trait (Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network-based gene prioritization approaches has been widely applied to identify new genes involved in biological processes of interests (Li et al, 2015), such as abiotic stress responses (Ma et al, 2014; Sircar and Parekh, 2015), secondary wall formation (Ruprecht et al, 2011), glucosinolate secondary metabolism (Chan et al, 2011), and plant growth (Sabaghian et al, 2015). In this study, we presented an integrative random forest method called RafSee and a meta-analysis based approach called RAP to prioritize genes from a large set of candidates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major challenge in plant biology is to identify the most promising genes from large lists of candidate genes (e.g., all genes in the whole genome) to find those which play an important role in an agricultural trait or a complex biological process (Lee et al, 2010; Li et al, 2015; Sabaghian et al, 2015). However, an experimental validation of every candidate gene is very time-consuming and costly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%