2011
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Ontology-driven inference of protein–protein interactions using inducers

Abstract: m.ragan@uq.edu.au.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annotations of these three aspects of genes or gene products are provided in terms of GO terms in the GOA database18. Recently GO terms have been successfully used as features to predict protein-protein interactions1920212223. There are two effective approaches to exploit GO terms for representing protein pairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The annotations of these three aspects of genes or gene products are provided in terms of GO terms in the GOA database18. Recently GO terms have been successfully used as features to predict protein-protein interactions1920212223. There are two effective approaches to exploit GO terms for representing protein pairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two effective approaches to exploit GO terms for representing protein pairs. One approach is to exploit the shared GO terms between two proteins and construct explicit binary feature vectors as the inputs of machine learning methods20212223, and the other approach is to measure the similarity between GO terms in GO DAG (directed acyclic graph) and construct an implicit kernel matrix as the input of kernel methods19.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, combining weak evidence for membership in an interactome can result in more successful predictors. Such approaches include Bayesian classifiers (18, 81, 112, 118, 194, 195), decision tree approaches (169) support vector machines (SVMs) (34, 101, 140), random forest classifiers (26, 27, 45), and a host of other techniques (13, 20, 74, 122, 126, 187). …”
Section: Building Interactomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the model performance, most of the existing methods generally leverage a catalog of biological feature information, e.g. binding motif, gene expression profile, gene co-expression, gene ontology, sequence k -mer, post-translational modification, protein structural information and PPI network topology1213142930, etc. Among these types of feature information, the sequence information of protein achieves relatively moderate discriminative ability2223, though less expensive to obtain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%