2016
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2015.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Therapy for X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Where Do We Stand?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ex vivo HSC gene therapy clinical trials involving SCID-X1 patients are demonstrating clear clinical benefits (reviewed by Cavazzana et al 45 ) but require elaborate protocols, sophisticated facilities, and gentotoxic conditioning. Here, we propose a simpler, safer, and more versatile gene therapy approach to SCID-X1 that involves the direct IV injection of FV vectors with no prior conditioning regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex vivo HSC gene therapy clinical trials involving SCID-X1 patients are demonstrating clear clinical benefits (reviewed by Cavazzana et al 45 ) but require elaborate protocols, sophisticated facilities, and gentotoxic conditioning. Here, we propose a simpler, safer, and more versatile gene therapy approach to SCID-X1 that involves the direct IV injection of FV vectors with no prior conditioning regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Southern blot analysis of human genomic DNA failed to demonstrate any significant homology with Moloney virus. Also, unlike X-SCID [6]—which is a single inherited gene disorder (mutation of γ c -encoding gene) occurring in infants/young children where retroviral vectors were used for the integration of the functional copy of γ c gene into the genome of CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells [30]—the Chiron gene therapy products were used in adults for the treatment of HIV, cancer, or hemophilia (11 studies). Furthermore, the gene therapies were either injected directly into the tumor, administered as intramuscular or intravenous injections, or used to transfect PBMCs that were non-stem cell in origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constitutive activation of the transgene 7 , the choice of vectors 8 and specific details of the gene therapy procedure have all been proposed as factors contributing to the risk of leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome that occurred in several trials for primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs) including SCID-X1 9, 10 , chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) 11, 12 and Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) 13 . With 2 nd generation self-inactivating (SIN) vectors, multiple SCID-X1 patients have successfully reconstituted T-cell immunity in the absence of early leukemic events 14,15,16 with a follow up of up to 7 years. However, the follow-up of these therapies remains too short to assess the long-term genotoxicity risk of the newer generation vectors, as transformation of T-4 cells growth can take more than 10 years to manifest (Six, E., et al, Abstract #753, ASGCT Meeting, 2017).One strategy to convert the semi-random delivery and integration of a corrective IL2RG cDNA into the genome is through a genome editing (GE) approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%