Neovascularization is needed for solid tumors to grow beyond a diameter of 2-3 mm. 1 Angiogenesis is accomplished by a series of sequential steps involving the motility and growth of endothelial cells: initiation and termination of these processes is tightly controlled by the balance between stimulatory and inhibitory factors. 1 Therefore, the delivery of inhibitory molecules and/or the removal of angiogenesis inducers could represent an effective approach to target and suppress tumor angiogenesis. Over the last decade, a number of anti-angiogenic agents were demonstrated to derive from a proteolytic cleavage of native proteins, as is the case for angiostatin, 2 endostatin, 3 platelet factor 4 (PF4), 4 or the 16-kDa N-terminal fragment of prolactin (16K PRL). 5 These factors, being 'natural' inhibitors of angiogenesis, are good candidates for an antiangiogenic therapy, as they should be much better tolerated by a patient than exogenous, synthetic drugs. Under most circumstances, however, angiogenesis inhibition appears to be cytostatic rather then cytotoxic, and therefore tumor growth inhibition would probably require prolonged maintenance therapy with the anti-angiogenic agents. The maintenance of this pro-