2007
DOI: 10.1021/ac070482y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Transfection of Mammalian Cells Using Membrane Sandwich Electroporation

Abstract: To avoid safety issues such as immune response and cytotoxicity associated with viruses and liposomes, physical methods have been widely used for either in vivo or ex vivo gene delivery. They are, however, very invasive and often provide limited efficiency. Using pEGFP and pSEAP plasmids and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts as models, we demonstrate a new electroporation-based gene delivery method, called membrane sandwich electroporation (MSE). The MSE method is able to provide better gene confinement near the cell surfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The permeabilization area can be controlled with the pulse amplitude and the degree of permeabilization can be controlled with the duration of pulses, numbers of pulses, where longer pulses provide a larger perturbation area in the cell membrane [34,35]. In earlier studies of micro/nanofluidic based single cell electroporation, authors analyze cellular content and cellular properties [36][37][38][39], transfection of cells [17,[40][41][42] and inactivating cells [43][44][45] with the use of micro-channel based electroporation [46][47][48][49], micro-capillary based electroporation [50][51][52], electroporation with solid microelectrode [36,[53][54][55], membrane sandwich based microfluidic electroporation [56,57], microarray single cell electroporation [58], optofluidic based microfluidic devices [59][60][61][62][63][64][65], etc. Table 1 describes in detail micro/nanofluidic based single cell transfection, cell lysis, cell type with species, potential difference, pulse duration, etc.…”
Section: Micro/nanofluidic Devices For Single Cell Electroporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permeabilization area can be controlled with the pulse amplitude and the degree of permeabilization can be controlled with the duration of pulses, numbers of pulses, where longer pulses provide a larger perturbation area in the cell membrane [34,35]. In earlier studies of micro/nanofluidic based single cell electroporation, authors analyze cellular content and cellular properties [36][37][38][39], transfection of cells [17,[40][41][42] and inactivating cells [43][44][45] with the use of micro-channel based electroporation [46][47][48][49], micro-capillary based electroporation [50][51][52], electroporation with solid microelectrode [36,[53][54][55], membrane sandwich based microfluidic electroporation [56,57], microarray single cell electroporation [58], optofluidic based microfluidic devices [59][60][61][62][63][64][65], etc. Table 1 describes in detail micro/nanofluidic based single cell transfection, cell lysis, cell type with species, potential difference, pulse duration, etc.…”
Section: Micro/nanofluidic Devices For Single Cell Electroporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, electroporation was integrated into microfluidic devices by using various types of mechanisms [13][14][15][16][17] . In comparison to conventional electroporation methods, microfluidic systems have some advantages, including the use of a lower applied electric field, lower sample and reagent consumption and reduced Joule heating 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A membrane sandwich electroporation device has been developed by integrating nanoporous membrane with an electrokinetic microfluidic platform. 4 We have accomplished tests with dextran (as model drugs) and reporting genes (GFP and SeAP) delivered into NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells. The efficiency is much better than the existing electroporation method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%