2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-010-0070-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene trees, species and species trees in the Ctenosaura palearis clade

Abstract: The growing use of molecular systematics in conservation has increased the importance of accurate resolution of taxonomic units and relationships. DNA data relate most directly to genealogies, which need not have perfect relationships with species limits and phylogenies. We used a multilocus gene tree approach to elucidate the relationships between four endangered Central American iguanas. We found support for the proposition that the described species taxa correspond to distinct evolutionary lineages warranti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our partitioned Bayesian analysis generated a concatenated tree for Brachycephalus that is identical in topology and degree of statistical support (posterior probabilities P95%) to the individual mtDNA gene tree. An inherent factor in the concatenation approach is that a high confidence in the concatenated tree can be the outcome of one or a few gene loci that contribute a greater fraction of nucleotides (and possibly variable sites) to the multilocus data set (Mossel and Vigoda, 2005;Pasachnik et al, 2010;Brito and Edwards, 2009). Here, the results show that the concatenated tree is being overridden by the mtDNA loci due to its disproportionate contribution to the data partition relative to the nuclear genes, as has been demonstrated in other studies (e.g., Pasachnik -0.…”
Section: Gene Trees Versus Concatenated Tree Versus Species Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our partitioned Bayesian analysis generated a concatenated tree for Brachycephalus that is identical in topology and degree of statistical support (posterior probabilities P95%) to the individual mtDNA gene tree. An inherent factor in the concatenation approach is that a high confidence in the concatenated tree can be the outcome of one or a few gene loci that contribute a greater fraction of nucleotides (and possibly variable sites) to the multilocus data set (Mossel and Vigoda, 2005;Pasachnik et al, 2010;Brito and Edwards, 2009). Here, the results show that the concatenated tree is being overridden by the mtDNA loci due to its disproportionate contribution to the data partition relative to the nuclear genes, as has been demonstrated in other studies (e.g., Pasachnik -0.…”
Section: Gene Trees Versus Concatenated Tree Versus Species Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent, empirical studies have inferred species trees with multiple loci, identifying more robust conclusions than from single markers, in spite of incomplete lineage sorting because of recent divergences and prolific gene‐tree heterogeneity (for some recent examples, see: Leache 2009; Li et al. 2010; Pasachnik et al. 2010; Themudo et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question has no single correct answer, but it remains important because many conservation laws and regulations use taxonomic categories as operational units. Indeed, a pragmatic species definition for conservation is “a distinct group of organisms meriting independent legal status because extinction of such a group would constitute a substantial loss of biological diversity” (Pasachnik et al 2010). In addition, even with an agreed upon definition of “species,” it is not always straightforward to relate this idea to observable patterns in genetic data (Shaffer and Thompson 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%