2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genealogies from Time-Stamped Sequence Data

Abstract: We review and develop Bayesian statistical methods for recovering genealogical structure, population size and mutation rates from radiocarbon-dated fossil mtDNA sequence data. It is possible to obtain ages for fossil DNA sequences and their common ancestors, by fitting a population-genetic model. We describe the observation model and show how uncertainty in reconstructed parameter values may be quantified via sample-based inference. We give an example, in which errors arising from radiocarbon calibration of fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, to further test whether haplotype divergence times date to the Pleistocene, we used the program beast (Drummond & Rambaut 2003), which also uses an MCMC approach (Drummond et al . 2002), to estimate the time to the most recent ancestor ( T mrca ) for all black‐throated blue warbler haplotypes included in our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to further test whether haplotype divergence times date to the Pleistocene, we used the program beast (Drummond & Rambaut 2003), which also uses an MCMC approach (Drummond et al . 2002), to estimate the time to the most recent ancestor ( T mrca ) for all black‐throated blue warbler haplotypes included in our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are proof-ofconcept examples in several application areas in Buck et al (1996) and others have also published examples (Orton, 2000;Millard, 2002;Millard and Gowland, 2002;Byers and Roberts, 2003;Millard, 2004Millard, , 2005Finke et al, 2008;van Leusen et al, 2009;Fernandes et al, 2014), there is really only one application area where Bayesian methods can be said to be routine: absolute, scientific-dating-based chronology construction. There is one other application area with close connections to archaeology, that of phylogeny (both genetic and linguistic), where use of Bayesian methods is also increasingly routine (Drummond et al, 2004;Edwards et al, 2007;Kitchen et al, 2009;Drummond et al, 2012;Bouckaert et al, 2014). Here, however, methodological development was driven largely by the genetics and linguistic research communities.…”
Section: Bayesian Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the shape of the genealogy depends on the population size through time and on the sample size and is affected by factors such as selection and (in subdivided populations) gene flow (30). Serial coalescence, in particular, allows one to consider both ancient and modern samples within the same genealogy (31) and test hypotheses regarding their demographic history. Here we used a serial coalescent program, SERIAL SIMCOAL (5), an extension of SIMCOAL (32), to simulate the evolution of the population of Tuscany.…”
Section: An Etruscan Social Elite?mentioning
confidence: 99%