2006
DOI: 10.1038/ng0506-500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GenePattern 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1,535
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,887 publications
(1,537 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1,535
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the SWIFT competitive template approach with alternative algorithms that could compare cluster data between groups of samples, using the available implementations on the GenePattern 35 server or in R:Bioconductor 36. Using the Aging 1 dataset, competitive SWIFT analysis was benchmarked against seven clustering and comparison algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the SWIFT competitive template approach with alternative algorithms that could compare cluster data between groups of samples, using the available implementations on the GenePattern 35 server or in R:Bioconductor 36. Using the Aging 1 dataset, competitive SWIFT analysis was benchmarked against seven clustering and comparison algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran ssGSEA from GenePattern (Reich et al., 2006) to compute the enrichment score of a given pathway in each sample. Using this tool, the gene expression values for a given sample were rank‐normalized, and an enrichment score was produced using the empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDF) of the genes in the gene set and the remaining genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2426 The ES was then compared between the two clusters using a Wilcoxon test. Since we observed a strong and significant enrichment of immune pathways, especially lymphocyte-related pathways, in cluster 1 compared to cluster 2 (Figure 1B; supplementary file 1), cluster 1 was named ‘immunological’.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, based on differential gene expression between OPL subtypes, we computed a gene expression score for the OPL classification, using the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) 24,25 from Gene Pattern. 26 We compared these methods of classification in terms of the accuracy percentage (= [number of samples misclassified/number of samples well-classified]*100).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation