2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07734-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General anaesthetic vs local anaesthetic myringoplasties: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures are increasingly being performed in the office [33,34]. Lerner et al conducted a systematic review of 25 papers, 40 years, and 29 504 patients, and found no difference in mortality or bleeding for in-office esophageal dilation under general GA or conscious sedation [35 ]. They reported bleeding, perforation, and mortality rates of 2%, 3%, and 2%, respectively.…”
Section: Ear Nose and Throat Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures are increasingly being performed in the office [33,34]. Lerner et al conducted a systematic review of 25 papers, 40 years, and 29 504 patients, and found no difference in mortality or bleeding for in-office esophageal dilation under general GA or conscious sedation [35 ]. They reported bleeding, perforation, and mortality rates of 2%, 3%, and 2%, respectively.…”
Section: Ear Nose and Throat Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%