2019
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2018.2873099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Analytical Modeling for Magnet Demagnetization in Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines

Abstract: This paper proposes an analytical model for the prediction of airgap magnetic field distribution (MFD) for axial flux permanent magnet (AFPM) machine with partial magnet demagnetization. The AFPM machine geometry is first converted to a polar representation. Consequently, the sub-domain model based on current sheet technique is developed. Then current sheet representation of PM is derived to consider the partial demagnetization using superposition principle. The back electro-magnetic forces and cogging torque … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling techniques [36], [37] have also been proposed for demagnetization and other faults which make it capable of estimating the demagnetization severity locally on the magnet [38] or for various magnet topologies in both radial-axial flux machines [39].…”
Section: Index Terms-conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling techniques [36], [37] have also been proposed for demagnetization and other faults which make it capable of estimating the demagnetization severity locally on the magnet [38] or for various magnet topologies in both radial-axial flux machines [39].…”
Section: Index Terms-conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, it can be seen in that the error comes. In [14], the ratio between the magnet radial thickness and the mean airgap radius is selected as the parameter.…”
Section: A Conversion Of Computed Calculation Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed information and the curvature can be found in [14], hence, not repeated here. Although the difference is only 4% for AFPM machine in this paper, the correction factor is still need to be applied to the final flux density results in order to achieve higher accuracy, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Conversion Of Computed Calculation Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During recent years, the demagnetization and the eccentricity fault have also been studied in the AFPM synchronous machine. More specifically [2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]] study the eccentricity fault, while [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] investigate the demagnetization fault in AFPM synchronous machines. In [31] a combined eccentricity and demagnetization fault in a double-sided AFPM synchronous machine using a time analytical model is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%