1980
DOI: 10.3130/aijsaxx.295.0_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GENERAL BUCKLING OF CYLINDRICAL RETICULATED SHELL ROOFS WITH ARBITRARY GENERATOR EDGES : Part 3 : Buckling with Imperfections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lattice shells are habitually designed with mainly gravity loads in mind, as they can span large distances efficiently without intermediate columns. Their general design against gravity loads and global buckling has been covered extensively in previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], for all sorts of geometries including elliptic paraboloids [11,12], spherical domes [13,14], and cylindrical forms [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Although these structures are mainly designed for gravity loads, horizontal forces produced by earthquakes can have a significant influence on various design and performance aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lattice shells are habitually designed with mainly gravity loads in mind, as they can span large distances efficiently without intermediate columns. Their general design against gravity loads and global buckling has been covered extensively in previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], for all sorts of geometries including elliptic paraboloids [11,12], spherical domes [13,14], and cylindrical forms [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Although these structures are mainly designed for gravity loads, horizontal forces produced by earthquakes can have a significant influence on various design and performance aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lattice shell structures are normally designed primarily for gravity loads, as their lightweight nature is ideal for large spans. Accordingly, their design for global stability under gravity loads has been studied extensively [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], for a wide array of configurations such as elliptic paraboloids [10,11], spherical domes [12,13], and cylindrical vaults [14][15][16][17][18][19]. In contrast, their design for seismic actions has received relatively less attention, particularly in terms of practical design considerations that can be used in codified guidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%