2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General calibration of TDR to assess the moisture of tropical soils using artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High clay and water contents limit the use of TDR; therefore, TDR readings must be calibrated to the studied soil to obtain more realistic volumetric water content (Acar, Çelik, & Günal, ; Stangl, Buchan, & Loiskandl, ). The calculated coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.81) for water content measurements obtained with TDR was comparable to that ( R 2 = 0.84) reported by Dasberg and Dalton () and lower than those (ranging from R 2 = 0.91–0.99) determined by Zanetti, Cecílio, Silva, and Alves (). The TDR readings have been converted to real moisture contents using the following equation created for the experimental soil.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…High clay and water contents limit the use of TDR; therefore, TDR readings must be calibrated to the studied soil to obtain more realistic volumetric water content (Acar, Çelik, & Günal, ; Stangl, Buchan, & Loiskandl, ). The calculated coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.81) for water content measurements obtained with TDR was comparable to that ( R 2 = 0.84) reported by Dasberg and Dalton () and lower than those (ranging from R 2 = 0.91–0.99) determined by Zanetti, Cecílio, Silva, and Alves (). The TDR readings have been converted to real moisture contents using the following equation created for the experimental soil.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These improvements were obtained without diminishing the moisture retrieval ability of the system, tested on a real soil. The obtained RMSEs in calibration (0.7%) and in validation (1.0%) are similar (or even better) to most of the results presented in papers regarding TDR or FDR, such as, for example, the works of [38] (RMSE = 1.26-2.37% in calibration) and [39] (RMSE = 2.0% in validation). Regarding non-invasive systems, the use of an open waveguide leads to a better moisture prediction ability than most of the studies presented in Table 1; the R 2 and RMSE values are higher than the ones obtained with the fiber spectrometer [16,23] and NIR reflectance sensor [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An example is provided by Yin et al [33] where a combination of 4 different soils can produce an R 2 value of 0.642 (RMSE up to 9.26 % according to the soil type and for a range of 0 -52 %) starting from a NIR reflectance sensor. R 2 value of about 0.973 was also shown by Zanetti et al [34] by using the apparent dielectric constant (Ka) obtained from TDR waveforms and a combination of different physical properties as input variables (bulk density, sand, silt, clay, and organic matter content) of ANN models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%