2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1063772917010085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General catalogue of variable stars: Version GCVS 5.1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
441
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 602 publications
(470 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
441
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The object was not well observed after the termination of the superoutburst to detect possible rebrightenings. The maximum V -magnitude is taken from ASAS-3 prediscovery observation, which is not reflected on GCVS (Samus et al 2011) and other catalogs. 17.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The object was not well observed after the termination of the superoutburst to detect possible rebrightenings. The maximum V -magnitude is taken from ASAS-3 prediscovery observation, which is not reflected on GCVS (Samus et al 2011) and other catalogs. 17.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources however suffer from either small numbers, only being applicable to a few variable types, or in the Armstrong et al (2015) case using variability classes derived from the light curves rather than externally recognized types. We cross-matched the observed K2 targets in fields 0-3 (4 was not available at that time) with catalogues of known variable stars, including those from AAVSO, 3 GCVS (Samus et al 2009) and ASAS (Richards et al 2012). This led to a small number of targets (a few tens of each class at best), not enough for a full training set.…”
Section: Training Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 presents the list of newly identified variables, their colors from Udalski et al (2000) and the suggested classification according to the GCVS scheme (Samus' et al 2017). Table 4 also lists one new variable, LMC SC19 184609, which was not selected as a candidate variable by the final run of the NN classifier.…”
Section: Blind Test On the New Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%