2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.67.104005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General-covariant evolution formalism for numerical relativity

Abstract: A general covariant extension of Einstein´s field equations is considered with a view to Numerical Relativity applications. The basic variables are taken to be the metric tensor and an additional four-vector Zµ. Einstein's solutions are recovered when the additional four-vector vanishes, so that the energy and momentum constraints amount to the covariant algebraic condition Zµ = 0. The extended field equations can be supplemented by suitable coordinate conditions in order to provide symmetric hyperbolic evolut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
232
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(134 reference statements)
6
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice also that the special (harmonic) case f = 1, λ = 2 has been shown in [25] to be symmetric hyperbolic for the parameter choice ζ = −1. The corresponding energy function can be written as but notice that this expression is far from being unique.…”
Section: B Gowdy Wavesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Notice also that the special (harmonic) case f = 1, λ = 2 has been shown in [25] to be symmetric hyperbolic for the parameter choice ζ = −1. The corresponding energy function can be written as but notice that this expression is far from being unique.…”
Section: B Gowdy Wavesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The same family of solutions that was used to show instability of the discretized ADM equations can be used for the standard discretization of the linearized Z4 system [19] o t a ¼ Àf ðK À mHÞ;…”
Section: The Z4 Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out to be related with the variableΓ i of the BSSN system, defined by Eq. (21) in [14]. (See also [16].)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%