1998
DOI: 10.3233/fi-1998-3612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Domain Circumscription and its Effective Reductions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Circumscription is an umbrella term for second-order characterisations of the minimal models of a first-order formula φ along an order. We combine general domain circumscription (GDC) [9,14] and parallel predicate circumscription [15].…”
Section: Unified Circumscriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Circumscription is an umbrella term for second-order characterisations of the minimal models of a first-order formula φ along an order. We combine general domain circumscription (GDC) [9,14] and parallel predicate circumscription [15].…”
Section: Unified Circumscriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof builds upon [9]. Given a model A of C (φ ) and B A, the internal structure of B can be "plugged in" the tuple D, M, V and verifies the left-hand side of the main implication in C (φ ); the righthand side implies that B cannot be strictly smaller than A.…”
Section: Unified Circumscriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the rst stage, we provide a PTIME (in the size of the input query) compilation process which uses a quanti er elimination algorithm called the DLS algorithm 6]. An extension for xpoint formulas is called the G-DLS algorithm 5,4,7]. The DLS algorithm takes as input a second-order formula and returns a logically equivalent rst-order formula, or terminates with failure, where failure does not mean there is not a reduction, but simply that the algorithm can not nd one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G-DLS algorithm is a generalization of the DLS algorithm and returns logically equivalent xpoint formulas for a wider class of inputs. Both algorithms can be combined into one algorithm which we denote by DLS (see 4,7]). Given the SHQL query, (Q), we pre x it with an existential quanti er and input the formula 9Q: (Q) to DLS .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%