2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02038.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General knowledge monitoring as a predictor of in‐class exam performance

Abstract: This study establishes a critical link between general monitoring accuracy and exam performance within a classroom setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, metacognition, plays a vital role in self-regulation, and self-regulated learning (e.g., Hartwig, Was, Isaacson, & Dunlosky, 2012;Thiede, Anderson, & Therriault, 2003). Findings that individuals with ASD show impaired metamemory monitoring thus need to be taken into account in educational environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, metacognition, plays a vital role in self-regulation, and self-regulated learning (e.g., Hartwig, Was, Isaacson, & Dunlosky, 2012;Thiede, Anderson, & Therriault, 2003). Findings that individuals with ASD show impaired metamemory monitoring thus need to be taken into account in educational environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the previously referenced studies conducted by Was and colleagues (e.g., Hartwig et al, 2012 ; Was et al, 2013 ) γ as the measure of knowledge monitoring accuracy did account for a significant amount of variance in classroom achievement as measured by a final examination. However, the amount of variance accounted for was relatively small ( r values between .26 and .42).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The current investigation was designed to test the efficacy of measures of knowledge monitoring accuracy in the context of a simple assessment of knowledge monitoring. Performance on many versions of this knowledge monitoring assessment has been linked to academic outcomes (e.g., Hartwig, Was, Isaacson, & Dunlosky, 2012 ). Gamma (γ) has been the measure of choice to assess individual differences in knowledge monitoring accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations