2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General method of analysis for composite beams with longitudinal and transverse partial interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, extensive work has been carried out relying on this model or extending its applicability. For example, some of these studies have focussed on the linear-elastic response of composite beam-columns (e.g., [4][5][6]), the shear deformability of the steel joist (e.g., [7,8]), the derivation of analytical and numerical models to predict the time-dependent behaviour of composite members (e.g., [9][10][11][12][13]) and related finite element (FE) or direct stiffness implementations (e.g., [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), formulations to account for shear-lag effects (e.g., [21,22]) and their FE applications (e.g., [14,23]), nonlinear material properties (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]), the nonlinear response in hogging moment regions (e.g., [29,30]), the occurrence of vertical separation between the slab and steel joist (e.g., [31]), the behaviour of timber composite solutions (e.g., [32,33]), making use of thermal prestressing (e.g., [34]), the derivation of analytical models for the partial interaction analysis of multi-layered members (e.g., [35,36]), and the buckling or nonlinear geometric composite response (e.g., [4,[36][37][38]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, extensive work has been carried out relying on this model or extending its applicability. For example, some of these studies have focussed on the linear-elastic response of composite beam-columns (e.g., [4][5][6]), the shear deformability of the steel joist (e.g., [7,8]), the derivation of analytical and numerical models to predict the time-dependent behaviour of composite members (e.g., [9][10][11][12][13]) and related finite element (FE) or direct stiffness implementations (e.g., [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), formulations to account for shear-lag effects (e.g., [21,22]) and their FE applications (e.g., [14,23]), nonlinear material properties (e.g., [24][25][26][27][28]), the nonlinear response in hogging moment regions (e.g., [29,30]), the occurrence of vertical separation between the slab and steel joist (e.g., [31]), the behaviour of timber composite solutions (e.g., [32,33]), making use of thermal prestressing (e.g., [34]), the derivation of analytical models for the partial interaction analysis of multi-layered members (e.g., [35,36]), and the buckling or nonlinear geometric composite response (e.g., [4,[36][37][38]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results are compared with the 1-D ones based on Euler-Bernoulli theory (Galuppi and Royer-Carfagni 2012) and the FE results obtained from the software ANSYS, respectively. In the FE model, the beam layers are simulated by the PLANE-183 elements, and the interlayers are equivalent to the distributed Hookean springs (Gattesco 1999;Ranzi et al 2006;Gara et al 2006) simulated by the COMBIN-14 elements. Consider a simply supported two-layer beam subjected to a sinusoidal load, which was studied by Galuppi and Royer-Carfagni (2012) based on the Euler-Bernoulli theory, as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 11 shows the load versus midspan deflection plots by proposed method, general method by Ranzi [8] and experimental data by Ansourian. It can be seen that there are Fig.…”
Section: Example 1: Two-span Continuous Composite Beammentioning
confidence: 99%