2016
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2015.0739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Optimized Lower and Upper Bounds for Discrete and Continuous Arithmetic Asian Options

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. We propose an accurate method for pricing arithmetic Asian options on the discrete or continuous average in a general model setting by means of a lower bound approximation. In particular, we derive analytical expressions for the lower bound in the Fourier domain. This is then recovered by a single univariate inversion and sharpened using an optimization technique. In addition, we derive an upp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A thorough survey of previous pricing attempts is beyond the scope of this paper; we refer, for example, to Fusai and Kyriakou (2016) for more details. 7 We felt that presenting speed-accuracy tradeoffs against true (but time-consuming) Monte Carlo price estimates indicating the substantial numerical gain of our method was beyond the scope of this paper, however, we can make them available upon request.…”
Section: The Option Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A thorough survey of previous pricing attempts is beyond the scope of this paper; we refer, for example, to Fusai and Kyriakou (2016) for more details. 7 We felt that presenting speed-accuracy tradeoffs against true (but time-consuming) Monte Carlo price estimates indicating the substantial numerical gain of our method was beyond the scope of this paper, however, we can make them available upon request.…”
Section: The Option Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough survey of previous pricing attempts is beyond the scope of this paper; we refer, for example, to Fusai and Kyriakou () for more details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that our parameter sets (see Table 2) correspond to various levels of volatility, skewness coefficient and excess kurtosis of the log-returns. We compare our results with benchmark prices generated by a control variate Monte Carlo (CVMC) strategy which uses as control variate the optimized option price lower bound of Fusai and Kyriakou (2016). To this end, we employ standard CVMC setup with the CV coefficient estimated in a pilot run (e.g., see Glasserman 2004).…”
Section: Application To the Valuation Of Commodity Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiraya and Takahashi (2011) propose an approximation formula for pricing average options under the Heston and extended SABR stochastic volatility models. Using the principles set out in Curran (1994) and Rogers and Shi (1995), Dingeç et al (2015) and, independently, Fusai and Kyriakou (2016) derive lower bounds under ASV models. Finally, Ewald et al (2013) propose a solution by means of a PDE and a Monte Carlo simulation method, whereas Yamazaki (2014) a pricing formula based on the Gram-Charlier expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we first revisit the long-standing problem of valuing non-linear derivatives contingent on the arithmetic average of the underlying asset prices with general monitoring frequency over a prespecified time period. There is a large body of literature on Asian options; we refer to Fusai and Kyriakou (2016) for more details. Analytical solutions are model-specific and quite rare; for this reason, there is a need for transform approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%