General practitioners versus other physicians in the quality of primary care: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province, China

Abstract

BackgroundThe primary care in China can be provided by general practitioners (GPs) and other physicians (non-GPs). However, China’s general practice system has never been really established. Chinese patients tend to consider the quality of primary care provided by GPs much lower than that of non-GPs. Besides, many GPs presently prefer leaving their own positions and seeking better development in big hospitals, which has made the already weak GP system weaker. Yet, few studies have specially compared the quality of primary care provided by Chinese GPs and other physicians and no studies have explored the independent predictors of Chinese GPs’ intentions to stay on their current job. In this study, we aimed to compare the quality of primary care offered by GPs with non-GPs and to explore the independent predictors of GPs’ future work intentions.MethodsThis cross-sectional study applied multi-stage random cluster sampling methodology. The data were collected from November 2013 to September 2014 in Guangdong Province. In total, 401 effective questionnaires were selected from the physicians. Quality of primary care was assessed using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) Provider Part, representing six primary care domains: ongoing care, coordination (i.e., referrals and information systems), comprehensiveness (i.e., service available and service provided), family-centeredness, community orientation and cultural competence.ResultsOf 401 participating physicians, 163 (40.6 %) were GPs. The total PCAT score was 26.32 ± 2.24 which was the sum score of the six domains and represent the quality of primary care. GPs achieved significantly different total scores and scores on three individual scales: comprehensiveness: service available, comprehensiveness: service provided and community orientation. Multiple linear regressions revealed GPs had a higher total score and scores for comprehensiveness: service provided and community orientation after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. In addition, GPs were more likely to intend to stay in their current job in the coming year, and this was associated with their educational level.ConclusionsOur findings showed that GPs reported higher quality of primary care than other physicians, and were more inclined to stay in their current job. With more comprehensive care and community orientation provided by GPs, residents could reach basic medical cares and needn’t to crowd into larger hospitals.

The development and impact of primary health care in China from 1949 to 2015: A focused review

“…Britain and Australia all provide better PHC because they have established and perfected the CHS system . General practitioners (GPs), the core of PHC, are often referred to as “gatekeepers.” A study in China indicated that the quality of PHC provided by GPs was better than that of non‐GPs, particularly in comprehensiveness relative to services provided and community orientation . However, the utilization of CHS institutions in China is relatively low, and Chinese patients tend to consider the quality of PHC provided by GPs as much lower than that of non‐GPs in large hospitals .…”

Does health reform achieve the goal of strengthening primary healthcare in China?

“…Furthermore, compared with hospitals, primary healthcare institutions had lower remuneration and limited career development prospects in China, which led to extremely low attraction for excellent health professionals (35) .For a long time, residents had no confidence in primary healthcare and blindly chose high-level hospitals. (37)(38)(39)(40)(41) In the past decade, the lag in the development of primary healthcare has further intensified patients to choose hospitals for medical services, resulting in reducing the business…”

The Development Trend of Primary Healthcare after Health Reform in China

“…There are some problems in primary healthcare institutions, including lacking of adequate health resources, sharp decline in health service provision and lack of trust for residents. (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) Based on the reasons above, primary healthcare institutions have become the least developing and most vulnerable part of health system in China.…”